On 02/27/2014 11:46 AM, Jim Cheetham wrote:
> How about just http://cygwin.com/install.html ?
> After all, we don't know what architecture someone might need for their
> system from here ...
Agreed this link is better.
We changed our setup.exe recently to support 64bit windows.
> Keith Winstein
How about just http://cygwin.com/install.html ?
After all, we don't know what architecture someone might need for their system
from here ...
-jim
Keith Winstein wrote:
Thanks for reporting this. Do you know what the correct Cygwin link should be?
Thank you,
Keith
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1
Thanks for reporting this. Do you know what the correct Cygwin link should
be?
Thank you,
Keith
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:57 AM, P. Blissenbach wrote:
> Hi,
> I am new to this list, and only popping in to tell that the cygwin part on
> the website
> http://mosh.mit.edu/#getting
> has a broken
Hi,
I am new to this list, and only popping in to tell that the cygwin part on the
website
http://mosh.mit.edu/#getting
has a broken link.
greetings.
Purodha
--
(this e-mail probably scanned by NSA and GCHQ and others)
___
mosh-devel mailing list
mos