Re: Organisational and 10^3 address books

2001-04-10 Thread Dan Mosedale
Paul Sandoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I modified the query string spec to use > 'and', 'or' and 'not' instead of the symbols > because the '|' is not a recommended character > in the URI spec. Makes sense. > Last week i got Org LDAP entries into the >

All new! - Investigate Anyone or Anything with this program!

2001-04-10 Thread largeshark
Internet Investigatorâ„¢ New for 2001 Internet Software Program for Online Investigations - Find Out Anything about Anyone Online - Uncover Information about:

Re: Address-book refactoring

2001-04-10 Thread Dan Mosedale
Paul Sandoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >Er... I heard there was some address book refactoring going on, so I > >thought I'd float this idea. > > > >Why do address book entries not have a field for "Encryption key" and a > >preference "automatically encrypt mail to this user" (enabled only wh

Re: Address book functionality, proposed putback 2.

2001-04-10 Thread Dan Mosedale
John Marmion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now that our first patch on re-factoring the Address Book > code is nearing its landing date, I thought it might be > appropriate to highlight what is coming in our second > patch and also to ask some questions. I am forwarding a > summary of the func

Re: Address-book refactoring

2001-04-10 Thread Nelson B. Bolyard
A few comments: First, to do the encryption (at least with S/MIME) you need more than the public key, you need the entire public key certificate chain. There's a certificate database (cert*.db) that contains public key certs, including trusted CA certs; and there's an encrypted private key DB (