I downloaded Mozilla 0.7 installed it and tested it out, worked fine then I
hit a page requiring Java... the download helper popped up and asked to
download and install it from Netscape.com which I let it do. It downloaded
and installed fine... then when I went to run Mozilla the drive blipped
Re: Bugzilla bug 17048
How can we at least start defining the requirements for this? Should a
new
module be started?
We should at least be able to define the interfaces to a roaming modules
regardless of whether we can actually get code from Netscape for the old
support. Ideally, this should be
I think the idea was more along the lines of having
the Mozilla organization host xpcom.org. It's a marketing/presentation change,
not a change of ownership. Right now XPCOM is buried inside the Mozilla browser
project and very few people are aware that it can be used as a standalone
tool.
Hi all,
I've installed .7 under Windows 98 and I'm trying to configure a
little cookie cutting program for it, but I need to know where .7
hides cookies it receives.
I can see 7 files that have the word cookie in their filename, but
not really sure which, if any, have anything to do with what
Gervase Markham wrote:
> Again, why does this require its own domain name? If you want to promote
> XPCOM, go for it - but expecting people to take more notice because it's
> www.xp.com or whatever rather than www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom is the
> ultimate triumph of style over substance.
Yeah,
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
> The last M18 nightly had Talkback.
> I see the latest M Trunk Nightly I have Last Friday's doesn't.
> Thank you! Thank You! Thank You!
No it didn't. You're simply wrong. No M18 nightly or any other nightly
for Mac had TalkBack. Mozilla Mac builds have never ha
On 24 Jan 2001, Brandon Hume - BORG Redirect wrote:
> Date: 24 Jan 2001 11:31:18 GMT
> From: Brandon Hume - BORG Redirect <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general
> Subject: Re: Copying text from Location field adds a carriage return to
> clipb
I have yet to look through the bug reports but I've tried adding mime
types to get rid of the "What do you want to do with this file" window
just to have .exe & .zip files automatically be saved. I add the
appropriate mime but still get the window, any thoughts or knowledge of
a bug report alr
Rick Parrish wrote:
>
> There are XPCOM applications out there that don't want/need/care
> about a browser but scream for a modular, component based architecure.
[...]
> Heck, why have a mozilla.org site? Why not call it
> http://www.aol.com/netscape/projects/mozilla ?
mozilla.org is not devot
TomMallard wrote:
> Users catch it right away when you cut a known feature like right-click
> "open in new window". Please use an applet/activex control to do what you
> need and leave the browser alone. If you do customize it, change icons and
> look-and-feel enough so IT doesn't get a million c
> That's one of the reasons that made me start my XPLC project. If XPCOM
> had been more of a standalone project that isn't so specific to Mozilla
> (or anything else), there would have had only a few other more technical
> points to fix and I wouldn't have even started XPLC.
Who else is using XP
Rick Parrish wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Gervase Markham wrote:
Heck, why have a mozilla.org site? Why not call ithttp://www.aol.com/netscape/projects/mozilla ?Because Mozilla isn't a division of AOL, or a part of Netscape, or one ofNetscape's projects. It's an independent entity.
While certa
Rick Parrish wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I think the mozilla project has grown to the point that
> it's XPCOM foundation is getting lost in a sea of browser
> specifics. I'd like to advocate a stronger identity for
> XPCOM - perhaps its own website for example.
>
> I see the potential for a lot of non-
"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote:
>
> Your not missing much with Talkback.
> It been my experience on Mac that Talkback cause crashes instead of
> reporting them. On Communicator for Mac the recomended course is to
> remove all traces of Talkback in Communicator and in system Files
> Talkback and
Rick Parrish wrote:
> The folks geared towards shipping a browser have done
> an excellent job but they are inclined to stop putting effort into XPCOM
> once it adequately serves their needs.
That's exactly right. But what's stopping you from putting in *your*
effort, *here*?
chris
Gervase Markham wrote:
> > Heck, why have a mozilla.org site? Why not call it
> > http://www.aol.com/netscape/projects/mozilla ?
>
> Because Mozilla isn't a division of AOL, or a part of Netscape, or one of
> Netscape's projects. It's an independent entity.
While certainly true in the spirit of
> Heck, why have a mozilla.org site? Why not call it
> http://www.aol.com/netscape/projects/mozilla ?
Because Mozilla isn't a division of AOL, or a part of Netscape, or one of
Netscape's projects. It's an independent entity.
Heck, why not have separate domain names for all mozilla.org's
compone
Hello,
Began the operation mail tools of the system LookAnswer. In what it differs
from other mail systems? Read below.
Come and evaluate! - http://mailto.com.ua
Setupping Outlook Express:
http://mailto.com.ua/help/en/out/,
Setupping The Bat!:
http://mailto.com.ua/help/en/bat/
Setupping Netscape
The last M18 nightly had Talkback.
I see the latest M Trunk Nightly I have Last Friday's doesn't.
Thank you! Thank You! Thank You!
Asa Dotzler wrote:
>
> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
>
> > Asa,
> > I reliaze that we are talking about Mozilla.
> > Talkback is included with both Mozilla, and
Rick Parrish wrote:
> I think the mozilla project has grown to the point that
> it's XPCOM foundation is getting lost in a sea of browser
> specifics. I'd like to advocate a stronger identity for
> XPCOM - perhaps its own website for example.
>
> I see the potential for a lot of non-browser appl
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
> Asa,
> I reliaze that we are talking about Mozilla.
> Talkback is included with both Mozilla, and netscape6 for Mac
point me to a mac Mozilla build with talkback.
--Asa
Asa,
I reliaze that we are talking about Mozilla.
Talkback is included with both Mozilla, and netscape6 for Mac and causes
same identical problems. There is a system conflict with the necessary
system extensions used in the Mac version
Asa Dotzler wrote:
>
> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
>
"Joel R. Daniel,CBSE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> dkeith wrote:
>
> > I made the very bad mistake of opening an attachment from a newsgroups
> > post the other day. The attachment was an executable file called
> > HAPPY99.exe
This is entire
Jeff Wollschleager wrote:
>> Ok, i've got it. Latest is whatever has hit the ftp last, could be
>> mtest or mtrunk. Thank you.
>>
>>
> Might want to look into changing the link on
> http://www.mozilla.org/binaries.html Download Latest Build to the
> MTrunk directory.
Thanks for your pat
"TomMallard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
004001c083b9$83267d20$2446cfcf@mallard">news:004001c083b9$83267d20$2446cfcf@mallard...
> Users catch it right away when you cut a known feature like right-click
"open in new
> window". Please use an applet/activex control to do what you need and
le
"Dan Piton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
94knt1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:94knt1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Greetings,
>
> I've been unable to find any information on Mozilla's support for XML Data
> Binding (what MS calls Data Islands). Should I be looking at W3C standard
> docs for this? C
Jeff Wollschleager wrote:
> Jeff Wollschleager wrote:
>
>> Asa Dotzler wrote:
>>
>>> Jeff Wollschleager wrote:
>>>
Asa,
If your still around tonight I just took a look at the
nightly's and see the win32-installer is only 6.5M, going to assume
it's one of the version
Jeff Wollschleager wrote:
> Asa Dotzler wrote:
>
>> Jeff Wollschleager wrote:
>>
>>> Asa,
>>> If your still around tonight I just took a look at the
>>> nightly's and see the win32-installer is only 6.5M, going to assume
>>> it's one of the versions we discussed earlier. Just thought I
Asa Dotzler wrote:
> Jeff Wollschleager wrote:
>
>> Asa,
>> If your still around tonight I just took a look at the
>> nightly's and see the win32-installer is only 6.5M, going to assume
>> it's one of the versions we discussed earlier. Just thought I would
>> let you know.
>
>
> what
Jeff Wollschleager wrote:
> Asa,
> If your still around tonight I just took a look at the nightly's
> and see the win32-installer is only 6.5M, going to assume it's one of
> the versions we discussed earlier. Just thought I would let you know.
what do you mean when you say "the nightly's
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Rick Parrish"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm assuming that Netscape/AOL has trademarked XPCOM.
I doubt it, and I doubt they could if they wanted to. It's too generic.
(If Microsoft had been able to trademark "COM", don't you think they'd
have sued over dilutio
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> I downloaded Netscape 6 (dumb of me). Among other things, it converted
> every image file in my computer over to a Netscape file. And to open an
> image, each time a new Netscape window opens, with an error message. I
> tried to de-ins
I wonder if there is a way to tell Mozilla where to locate
the cache. The default is to put it into .mozilla
in the home directory.
I want to move it to some tmp space that isnt
backed up.
Netscape 4.x had an entry in the advanced preferences
to do that.
Johann
Hi,
I would like to change the selection color (and some fonts) of
Netscape-4.76 under Linux. I have already changed
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults/Netscape but it did not help.
Do you have any ideas?
--
Zsolt Koppany
Intland GmbH www.intland.com
Schulze-Delitzsch-Strasse 16
D-70565 Stuttgart
Asa Dotzler wrote:
> talkback is extremely
> useful to us in a number of ways and I encourage people to use these
> builds whenever possible.
>
> --Asa
FWIW, I always downloaded and used the win32 talkback builds until they
grew to more than twice the size of the installer. Now it takes *way*
Gervase Markham wrote:
> Again, why does this require its own domain name? If you want to promote
> XPCOM, go for it - but expecting people to take more notice because it's
> www.xp.com or whatever rather than www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom is the
> ultimate triumph of style over substance.
>
> G
> What's the point of
> contributing your time and energy to something that's getting ignored?
That's promotion - that's different.
> Let's capture some "mind share" among the software development
> community.
Again, why does this require its own domain name? If you want to promote
XPCOM, go fo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, mwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I downloaded Netscape 6 (dumb of me). Among other things, it converted
>every image file in my computer over to a Netscape file. And to open an
>image, each time a new Netscape window opens, with an error message. I
>tried to de-in
I am trying to access a local page on my machine and it asks me for a
username and password. The same happens when I try to access the same page
on my local IIS server (the one built in to Windows 2000).
I have tried my normal username and password and all other ones that it
could possibly be.
Jon Smirl wrote:
> I would also like to see XPCOM/NSPR as a standalone project that has Mozilla
> as it's biggest client. I use XPCOM (via XPConnect standalone) in a server
> environment that doesn't have Mozilla installed. By breaking the XPCOM/NSPR
> source out from Mozilla it would become much
I downloaded Netscape 6 (dumb of me). Among other things, it converted
every image file in my computer over to a Netscape file. And to open an
image, each time a new Netscape window opens, with an error message. I
tried to de-install Netscape 6, but found only a text file. I am now
back to ver
Gervase Markham wrote:
> Why does something need its own domain to be independent? That's just
> icing. We should do the actual work, and leave the web pages where they
> are - on www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom/ . A lot of Moz subsystems are
> moving towards componentisation and separate release
> xpcom.org, xpcom.net, xpcom.com are registered to:
Why does something need its own domain to be independent? That's just
icing. We should do the actual work, and leave the web pages where they
are - on www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom/ . A lot of Moz subsystems are
moving towards componentisatio
43 matches
Mail list logo
