Is it possible for a mere bug-reporter to look through talkback data
to look for stack traces duplicate/similar to the ones you find?
Thanks in advance.
--
Matthew Cline| Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | you were a member of Congress. But I repeat
Daniel Howe, on Friday 04 May 2001 11:04 am, did channel for the
terrible Great Old Ones, and imparted unto us these blasphemous
ravings:
> Hey,
> All of a sudden I've started to get seg. faults on launch of
> mozilla. I haven't changed anyting in Permission_Add(); (it still
> uses nsString) -
{fws} Frank wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Uninstall instructions with 0.8.1 state to uninstall via Windows
> install/uninstall in control panel. Moz isn't listed there. I
> downloaded and installed the ZIP file into a folder & then just made a
> shortcut to the .exe file. Does that mean I would just de
JTK wrote:
>
> Gervase Markham wrote:
> >
> > > IE5: 13,032K
> >
> > How did you get that figure? Remember IE conceals a lot of its memory
> > usage in the chunk allocated to the OS.
> >
>
> So the fable goes, which is why I suggest we eliminate Microsoft from
> discussion on this issue. Here's
Ken wrote:
> David Hallowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Ken wrote:
>>
>
>> > Any way to get the long lost Open button back, especially for X?
>> > This to me was always essential.
>>ctrl-o will give you an open files dialog and ctrl-l will give you focus
>>on the URL bar
>>
>
> alt-
Adrian wrote:
> Could anybody tell me what this ZIP archive contains, is this
>
> a full Mozilla install for Win32 ?
>
> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla0.8.1/embed-win32-0.8.1.z
> ip
The embed builds contain only the embedding widget. The zip packages
contain (if I rememb
Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> > > Browse a chosen 20
> > > sites in the two browsers (of equal HTML and CSS functionality), then
> > > check the memory usage.
> >
> > Ah, Mr. Markham, do you *really* want me to do that, and report back
> > with the results?
>
> Yep. If you like.
Done and done.
>
Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> > IE5: 13,032K
>
> How did you get that figure? Remember IE conceals a lot of its memory
> usage in the chunk allocated to the OS.
>
So the fable goes, which is why I suggest we eliminate Microsoft from
discussion on this issue. Here's what NETSCAPE COMMUNICATOR 4.77
Hey,
All of a sudden I've started to get seg. faults on launch of mozilla. I
haven't changed anyting in Permission_Add(); (it still uses nsString) - Gdb
gives me the following backtrace... Anyone seen this before???
#0 0x4036931b in free () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x4022b5ea in PR_Free () from
Adrian wrote:
> Could anybody tell me what this ZIP archive contains, is this
>
> a full Mozilla install for Win32 ?
>
> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla0.8.1/embed-win32-0.8.1.z
> ip
>
>
>
No, that's just the embedded version of Mozilla. Find the files near the
bottom o
Could anybody tell me what this ZIP archive contains, is this
a full Mozilla install for Win32 ?
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla0.8.1/embed-win32-0.8.1.z
ip
Ken wrote:
> David Hallowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Ken wrote:
>>
>
>> > Any way to get the long lost Open button back, especially for X?
>> > This to me was always essential.
>>
>
>>I assume you're talking about the browser component? Last seen in 3.x
>>almost forgotten by all!
>>
>
JTK wrote:
>
> "Justin H." wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >
> > After 10 minutes of heavy surfing, I end up at ~20 megs.
>
> How?
If I knew that, don't you think I'd tell the devs? :-Þ
> > I started out
> > somewhere around ~15 megs. My start page is about:
> >
>
> I started, just now, at 20,180 K
David Hallowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ken wrote:
> > Any way to get the long lost Open button back, especially for X?
> > This to me was always essential.
> I assume you're talking about the browser component? Last seen in 3.x
> almost forgotten by all!
Yes, exactly.
> ctrl-o will g
JTK wrote:
> I started, just now, at 20,180 K. My start page was about:.
You've got 256M, what's an extra 10M? Come to think of it if you're so
happy with IE and Outlook why are you here?
I'm using Mozilla 0.8.1 here with a K6-2 500 and 128M and I have no
problems with resource usage or spee
Ken wrote:
> Any way to get the long lost Open button back, especially for X?
> This to me was always essential.
I assume you're talking about the browser component? Last seen in 3.x
almost forgotten by all!
ctrl-o will give you an open files dialog and ctrl-l will give you focus
on the URL
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ian Davey wrote:
>>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >Well I'd hope so, given how much memory it hogs. Again, over 22MB *TO
>> >DISPLAY A BLANK PAGE*.
>>
>> On what platform,
>
>Why2K.
>
>>
> > Browse a chosen 20
> > sites in the two browsers (of equal HTML and CSS functionality), then
> > check the memory usage.
>
> Ah, Mr. Markham, do you *really* want me to do that, and report back
> with the results?
Yep. If you like. At which point I would say "Yes, Mozilla's memory usage
co
> IE5: 13,032K
How did you get that figure? Remember IE conceals a lot of its memory
usage in the chunk allocated to the OS.
> Looks like JTK's got a point, eh?
If he says that Mozilla's memory usage is not all it could be, of course
he has a point. I don't think anyone would claim that there's
19 matches
Mail list logo
