Re: Mozilla 0.9.4 Perfomance

2001-10-04 Thread Jay Garcia
Tom wrote: > > Why does it seem that Mozilla 0.9.3 renders and loads pages faster > than 0.9.4? Has anyone else experienced this trait? If so, can anyone > explain why this may be the case? Also, I seem to get more crashes > using 0.9.4 than 0.9.3 > > Thanks, > Tom > >

[±¤°í] »ç¶ûÇÏ´Â »ç¶÷À» À§ÇÑ Æ¯º°ÇÑ ¼±¹°

2001-10-04 Thread µµ¿ì¹Ì
Title: »ç¶ûÀ» ÀüÇÏ´Â ·¯ºêÄÉÀÍ  ·¯ºêÄÉÀÍ lovecake

Home Owners ONLY

2001-10-04 Thread davidsingh
We will help you get the mortgage loan you want! http://m0106252000.mysprintfast.com/mortgage%20files/testindex.html http://m0106252000.mysprintfast.com/mortgage%20files/testindex.html";>AOL Link Whether a new home loan is what you seek or to refinance your current home loan at a lower interes

Mozilla 0.9.4 Perfomance

2001-10-04 Thread Tom
Why does it seem that Mozilla 0.9.3 renders and loads pages faster than 0.9.4? Has anyone else experienced this trait? If so, can anyone explain why this may be the case? Also, I seem to get more crashes using 0.9.4 than 0.9.3 Thanks, Tom

Re: The toolbar: it's in, it's out

2001-10-04 Thread Brendan Eich
David Hyatt wrote: > Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > >> I'd add that this can be extremely frustrating for people outside >> netscape. There are definitely two kinds of developers in the Mozilla >> project: those at netscape who can get r/sr/a in the space of 10 >> minutes, >> and those not a netscap

Re: Interplay's website with Mozilla 0.9.4 - no go?

2001-10-04 Thread Lucas MacBride
Eric Vaandering wrote: > Lucas MacBride wrote: > >> Erik Harris wrote: >> >>> http://www.interplay.com/product.asp?GameID=299 >>> >>> I was looking for a patch for Baldur's Gate 2, and when I went to its >>> page on >>> Interplay's site (linked above), I get "One MomentLoading >>> Informat

Re: The toolbar: it's in, it's out

2001-10-04 Thread David Hyatt
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > I'd add that this can be extremely frustrating for people outside > netscape. There are definitely two kinds of developers in the Mozilla > project: those at netscape who can get r/sr/a in the space of 10 minutes, > and those not a netscape whose work is scrutinized, c

Connection Refused

2001-10-04 Thread Roy R Campbell Jr
The browser from build 20011001 is the last build that I have been able to use to visit websites. I am appending to this forum using the mail-news client from the latest build for Win98, 20011004, because the mail-news client works, but I cannot use the browser. Any attempt to browse a

Re: your RAND comments

2001-10-04 Thread Gervase Markham
> I think this is really the central point of the dispute; "reasonable and > non-discriminatory" is a very vague way of putting it. Realistically, I > think most of the people would be satisfied if the document contained > explicit language safeguarding free software/open source. Unfortunatel

Re: The toolbar: it's in, it's out

2001-10-04 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
In article <9pieod$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jeffrey W. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Taken from Bug 103082: > > --- Additional Comments From Brendan Eich 2001-10-04 12:50 --- > > hyatt, perhaps we should take this to a newsgroup, but I still think > you're on dangerous ground by actin

The toolbar: it's in, it's out

2001-10-04 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
Taken from Bug 103082: --- Additional Comments From Brendan Eich 2001-10-04 12:50 --- hyatt, perhaps we should take this to a newsgroup, but I still think you're on dangerous ground by acting as high back-out sheriff. If everyone did that for a 5% performance regression, I'd be happier.

Re: can you get AOL IM to use with mozilla

2001-10-04 Thread Jason Kersey
No, unless you move the netscape skin and locale files over to the mozilla build, which likely won't work anyways. Jason Jonathan Wilson wrote: > Can you download AOL IM seperatly from netscape and then install it on a > system with mozilla? >

Re: your RAND comments

2001-10-04 Thread Chris Hoess
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ian Hickson wrote: >>>2. The proposal would guarentee that all standards are available to >>> everyone in the form of Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory licenses, >>> i.e. free software groups would not be excluded (assuming they can >>> pool t

Re: Interplay's website with Mozilla 0.9.4 - no go?

2001-10-04 Thread Eric Vaandering
Lucas MacBride wrote: > Erik Harris wrote: > >> http://www.interplay.com/product.asp?GameID=299 >> >> I was looking for a patch for Baldur's Gate 2, and when I went to its >> page on >> Interplay's site (linked above), I get "One MomentLoading >> Information" >> >> With Netscape 4.78 and w

Re: Site that doesn't render at all in Mozilla

2001-10-04 Thread Canasta
WorksForMe using Mac/2001091311 (0.9.4). In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, dman84 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > there is a bug for that one.. and at the time of this writing: > > site is down. > > Holger Metzger wrote: > > > Mike Koenecke wrote: > > > > > >>http://www.sonystyle.com > >> > >>c

Move profile

2001-10-04 Thread Pascal Sartoretti
Hello, Problem on my Mac (OS/X 10.0.4) with Mozilla 0.9.4: how can I tell the user profile manager to use an existing profile present on disk at a certain location? Thanks for any help Pascal

Re: Status of some important features

2001-10-04 Thread Sören Kuklau
www.mozillanews.org www.mozillazine.org :) "Fulvio Perini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have tried to find out somewhere of the status or progress of some > features which are missing in Mozilla/NS6.I did searches in mozilla.org > a

Re: your RAND comments

2001-10-04 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > Ian wrote: >> To summarise: >> >>1. The current situation is *not* that of royalty free licenses >> automatically applying to standards. The W3C currently has *no* >> patent policy, and this has bitten the community in the past, >>

Re: is mozilla stable?

2001-10-04 Thread Jay Garcia
Erik Harris wrote: > On Tue, 02 Oct 2001 08:02:25 -0500, Jay Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>It all depends on how "market share" is calculated. If you count all of >> > > Sure does. I was referring to the "market" as USAGE, though. I don't care > how many systems have a browser inst

Re: Installing Mozilla 0.9.4 with MSIE/Outlook

2001-10-04 Thread Brian S. Craigie
Robert Crews wrote: > I'm sorry. I didn't answer your question directly. > > I have not had any problems whatsoever with my system that can be > traced to having Mozilla installed. Not with IE. Not with Outlook. Not > at all. > > My problems, through minor, stem from insisting on using Mozilla

Re: Site that doesn't render at all in Mozilla

2001-10-04 Thread dman84
there is a bug for that one.. and at the time of this writing: site is down. Holger Metzger wrote: > Mike Koenecke wrote: > > >>http://www.sonystyle.com >> >>comes up entirely blank in Mozilla. Just out of curiousity, can >>someone tell me why? >> >> > > Loads here, but I guess it doesn't di