I've just installed linux (on my other PC) and now want to install
mozilla. I've heard that RPM's are the easies way to do this. It that
correct ?
Can someone provide me with a step by step instruction on how to
install? I'm competant on windows, but lost on Linux :( Any help will
be
I mean, programmatically. Sorry for being unclear.
On 10/25/2001 9:28 AM, Damien Covey wrote:
I've just installed linux (on my other PC) and now want to install
mozilla. I've heard that RPM's are the easies way to do this. It that
correct ?
Can someone provide me with a step by step instruction on how to
install? I'm competant on
I just checked in a slew of tab browsing changes and fixes. Here's a list:
(1) The tabs now flex and shrink down as you add more tabs in order to
fit within the window. You should not really have any serious overflow
problems any longer with this solution.
(2) The confusing close box on the
Daniel Veditz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone decided to bump the skin version number, blocking old skins from
use. Personally I'd have rather made my own decisions about whether the skin
had degraded to an unusable point or not.
I don't think it is this, since the littlemozilla theme was
Hi folks,
I've just done a fresh install of Moz 0.9.5 on a new (Windows 2000)
machine followed by an install of the JDK 1.3.1_01. Although I can see
Java as having been installed in About/plugins, when I go to a site that
uses Java (eg http://www.citscapes.ac.uk), I can't see the applet.
Any
Hi,
i just wanted to report a bug at www.mozilla.org, but i cant process the
button to submit my report and that is actually the point. Most of any
buttons on any website just dont initiate what they should do - like
when i have to fill out a form and press the submit button nothing
happens
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:03:38 +0100, J B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having problems running Mozilla on a Win2K box, with Roaming, or
Synchronised, profiles. [for example, the APPDATA environment variable is a
UNC path, and not a mapped drive.. this I cant change]
Anyone have a fix for this?
On 10/25/2001 4:51 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
I just checked in a slew of tab browsing changes and fixes. Here's a list:
(1) The tabs now flex and shrink down as you add more tabs in order to
fit within the window. You should not really have any serious overflow
problems any longer with
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bernard Perrot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I just tried Mozilla 0.9.5 on a Linux RedHat 7.1 box, and now, the fonts when
I print a page or a mail are twice the size it was with version 0.9.4...
Is it a know problem ?
Thanks,
I'm experiencing the same
(2) The confusing close box on the far right has been
eliminated. Looking for ideas for a better solution
(perhaps an X on the tab only when it is the active tab).
snip
Putting an X in the active tab will make it a little too
busy.
How about a 'mouseover' type effect in that the 'X'
David Hyatt schrieb:
(2) The confusing close box on the far right has been eliminated.
Looking for ideas for a better solution (perhaps an X on the tab only
when it is the active tab).
FWIW, my favoured tab-closure method is to have Ctrl-W close the
active tab. If there are no inactive tabs,
(2) The confusing close box on the far right has been eliminated.
Looking for ideas for a better solution (perhaps an X on the tab only
when it is the active tab).
I like the MultiZilla way of middle clicking on the tab to close it.
Pratik.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Moshe Kravchik) wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I mean, programmatically. Sorry for being unclear.
location = ('foo.html');
in javascript.
-Original Message-
From: Magnus W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 October 2001 17:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to force Netscape 6 to reload a page?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Moshe Kravchik) wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I mean, programmatically.
How about a 'mouseover' type effect in that the 'X' only
appears when you move the mouse over the tab ?? Maybe add a
short delay before it appears so that it doesn't appear when
you're simply trying to select that tab.
Oh no! You shouldn't do this for the same reason you shouldn't have a
Pratik wrote:
(2) The confusing close box on the far right has been eliminated.
Looking for ideas for a better solution (perhaps an X on the tab only
when it is the active tab).
I like the MultiZilla way of middle clicking on the tab to close it.
That'd be no good on Linux, middle
How about a 'mouseover' type effect in that the 'X' only
appears when you move the mouse over the tab ??
Maybe add a short delay before it appears so that it
doesn't appear when you're simply trying to select that
tab.
Oh no! You shouldn't do this for the same reason you
shouldn't
Hall Stevenson wrote:
How about a 'mouseover' type effect in that the 'X' only
appears when you move the mouse over the tab ??
Maybe add a short delay before it appears so that it
doesn't appear when you're simply trying to select that
tab.
Oh no! You shouldn't do this for
On 10/25/01 12:25 PM, Ian Davey wrote:
Pratik wrote:
(2) The confusing close box on the far right has been eliminated.
Looking for ideas for a better solution (perhaps an X on the tab only
when it is the active tab).
I like the MultiZilla way of middle clicking on the tab to close it.
Screwtape wrote:
David Hyatt schrieb:
(2) The confusing close box on the far right has been eliminated.
Looking for ideas for a better solution (perhaps an X on the tab only
when it is the active tab).
FWIW, my favoured tab-closure method is to have Ctrl-W close the
active tab. If there
ahmetaa wrote:
According to news.com,
posibly you've already heard, msn does not work with no browser but IE now.
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-7655334.html?tag=mn_hd
Coincedence? No.
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
email [ jesusx @
lloyd llewellyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- are there capable individuals who are interested in hacking Mozilla as a
hired gig? If so, what's the best route to find them?
n.p.m.jobs is a reasonable place to post a notice about this. It's
possible that mozillazine
Pratik wrote:
(2) The confusing close box on the far right has been eliminated.
Looking for ideas for a better solution (perhaps an X on the tab only
when it is the active tab).
I like the MultiZilla way of middle clicking on the tab to close it.
Pratik.
That's nice, but what
David Hyatt wrote:
(2) The confusing close box on the far right has been eliminated.
I liked the close box at the end. When I'm looking at pictures, I can
open them from thumbnails into different tabs, and then start at the
end, and then close them all in sequence. It works great!
Orrin
ahmetaa wrote:
According to news.com,
posibly you've already heard, msn does not work with no browser but IE now.
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-7655334.html?tag=mn_hd
I wrote to MSN Support a couple days ago, and got this response:
Hello Orrin,
Thank you for contacting Microsoft.
The site works in netscape 4.x but does not work
in mozilla0.9.5. Increadible.
--
David Hyatt wrote:
(4) You can now drag a URL to a tab and have it load in that tab.
Whether or not the tab comes to the front when you drop is based off
the background loading pref (the same one used when you middle-click a
link).
om)
What's the name of that pref? I remember the
Putting the X there in the first place was not based on any usability
data. Given that the whole feature hasn't really been through any
usability testing, all I really have to go on is feedback from the
newsgroups. :)
Another reason the X is confusing is that I want to support having the
ahmetaa wrote:
According to news.com,
posibly you've already heard, msn does not work with no browser but IE
now.
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-7655334.html?tag=mn_hd
Look at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97222. They're
blocking Netscape 6.1 because of unspecified
Albert wrote:
ahmetaa wrote:
According to news.com,
posibly you've already heard, msn does not work with no browser but IE
now.
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-7655334.html?tag=mn_hd
Look at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97222. They're
blocking Netscape 6.1
What is the proper group to ask a question about mail on Netscape 6.1?
I'm trying to figure out how to request acknowledgment and provide a
digital signature for a mail message. I haven't been successful.
And it came to pass that Vincent F. Scarafino wrote:
What is the proper group to ask a question about mail on
Netscape 6.1? I'm trying to figure out how to request
acknowledgment and provide a digital signature for a mail
message. I haven't been successful.
Use the Support groups for
Random Liegh wrote:
Albert wrote:
ahmetaa wrote:
According to news.com,
posibly you've already heard, msn does not work with no browser but
IE now.
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-7655334.html?tag=mn_hd
Look at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97222. They're
barney wrote:
Pratik wrote:
(2) The confusing close box on the far right has been eliminated.
Looking for ideas for a better solution (perhaps an X on the tab only
when it is the active tab).
I like the MultiZilla way of middle clicking on the tab to close it.
Pratik.
Aaron Andersen wrote:
David Hyatt wrote:
(4) You can now drag a URL to a tab and have it load in that tab.
Whether or not the tab comes to the front when you drop is based off
the background loading pref (the same one used when you middle-click a
link).
om)
What's the name of that
Outside of the fact that this is Microsoft speaking...
Visse sez that they didn't want to support browsers that we know don't
support (W3C) standards or that we can't insure will get a great
experience for the customer.
My impression was that Mozilla is the litmus test for W3C compliance.
Am I
I'm having a simple problem, no doubt the answer is well known
although I can't find it in the archives:
I use cascading style sheets (CSS) to specify the exact size, in
pixels, I want my fonts to appear. This works great in IE, where the
user sees the font the same size no matter what choices
Webmeister wrote:
I'm having a simple problem, no doubt the answer is well known
although I can't find it in the archives:
I use cascading style sheets (CSS) to specify the exact size, in
pixels, I want my fonts to appear. This works great in IE, where the
user sees the font the same
daa wrote:
barney wrote:
Pratik wrote:
(2) The confusing close box on the far right has been eliminated.
Looking for ideas for a better solution (perhaps an X on the tab only
when it is the active tab).
I like the MultiZilla way of middle clicking on the tab to close
Title: TSA test
Security focus
Time Stamping Authority
C A
was the first company in the world to develop a
Time Stamping Authority that was evaluated ITSEC E2 HIGH by
IMQ-Milan in July 2000.
If you have java enabled and then load the page it continully thrashes
the disk until you have to reboot or kill mozilla.
I assume it is some sort of loop.
I have 0.9.5 and jre 1.3.1
bob
Garth Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 25 Oct 2001:
clicking both buttons ( chord)
What's the solution for a *one*-button mouse?
Double clicking both buttons ;)
--
ICQ: N/A (temporarily)
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ = m
--- Garth Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
daa wrote:
barney wrote:
Pratik wrote:
That's nice, but what if you've only got a
2-button mouse? What's the
equivalent to middle click?
buy a new mouse
What's the solution for a *one*-button mouse?
buy a new mouse or get
Why would it change ?? It would only change from nothing to an
'x'. It either works or it doesn't work. I'm not suggesting a
dual-function like you are when comparing to a search/stop
button.
You mouse over a tab in order to click it to move it to the front. For
whatever reason, you
I say we call the Microsoft PR division and ask them questions about
what they are gonna do with those other browsers. I looked around on
the Microsoft site, and found this under the consumer group PR Contacts:
MSN, MSN Services (Hotmail, MSN eShop, MSN Internet Access, MSN
Messenger
On 10/25/2001 8:24 PM, Garth Wallace wrote:
daa wrote:
barney wrote:
Pratik wrote:
(2) The confusing close box on the far right has been eliminated.
Looking for ideas for a better solution (perhaps an X on the tab only
when it is the active tab).
I like the MultiZilla way of middle
On 10/25/2001 12:16 PM, ahmetaa wrote:
According to news.com,
posibly you've already heard, msn does not work with no browser but IE now.
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-7655334.html?tag=mn_hd
Works here, no problem. Didn't try EVERY link but at least a dozen or so
what worked ok.
one button mouses are worthless IMHO...
Garth Wallace wrote:
daa wrote:
barney wrote:
Pratik wrote:
(2) The confusing close box on the far right has been eliminated.
Looking for ideas for a better solution (perhaps an X on the tab only
when it is the active tab).
I like the MultiZilla
MSN is no longer a Web site. It's a Windows site.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Orrin Edenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I say we call the Microsoft PR division and ask them questions about
what they are gonna do with those other browsers. I looked around on
the Microsoft site, and found
#!/bin/sh
cd /tmp
/usr/bin/wget
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/mozilla-win32.zip
rm -rf /vols/next/c/Program\ Files/mozilla-win32/bin/*
cd /vols/next/c/Program\ Files/mozilla-win32/
/usr/bin/unzip -o -C -u /tmp/mozilla-win32.zip
mv /tmp/mozilla-win32.zip
Webmeister wrote:
I'm having a simple problem, no doubt the answer is well known
although I can't find it in the archives:
I use cascading style sheets (CSS) to specify the exact size, in
pixels, I want my fonts to appear. This works great in IE, where the
user sees the font the same size
daa wrote:
barney wrote:
Pratik wrote:
(2) The confusing close box on the far right has been eliminated.
Looking for ideas for a better solution (perhaps an X on the tab only
when it is the active tab).
I like the MultiZilla way of middle clicking on the tab to close it.
They backed out and are going to allow Mozilla and Opera. Does anyone
know what the hell they mean when they say
But, Visse warned, "the experience may be slightly degraded simply because they
don't support the standards we support closely, as far as the HTML standard in those
browsers."
Pratik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Oct 2001:
But, Visse warned, the experience may be slightly degraded simply
because they don't support the standards we support closely, as
far as the HTML standard in those browsers.
Sounds to me like they
55 matches
Mail list logo
