Hi, some days ago I have send a mail (with also the code that I used)
on the use of parent for access on data contained into form of other
frames that on Netscape 6 and Mozilla 0.9 doesn't work (on Netscape 4
instead work). Anyone have encountered the same problem?
Thank you for any help
Blake Ross wrote:
Right, now let's all say it together: What AOL wants, AOL gets, and the
rest of the Open Maozilla community has no option but to suck it down.
Your attempts at starting some sort of mass rebellion against Netscape
are failing miserably. But I guess you've already
David Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 14:12:10 -0600,
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Sören Kuklau wrote:
: True. I'm not gonna defend the favicon behaviour, but I also consider it
: futile to further bother to complain against it. In other words: You gotta
: live with it.
:Right,
just email us at: REMOVE MY EMAIL ADDRESS
MetabolicGold
Formula
TM
Are You One Of The 70 Million Americans
SufferingThe
Oh, I also got some motion happening on relicensing with my Licensing
Statistics posts. And got the ball rolling on perfomance criteria for
the 1.0 release. But who's counting?
As the person who actually did the work for relicensing, I can say with
certainty that your post was merely
Sören Kuklau wrote:
I just asked whether people agreed so I could find out whether there
generally is interest - which there is, seemingly even by mozilla.org staff
(Gerv). As soon as I find some time, I'll try and start designing it.
Excellent. A good set of FAQs for Mozilla would be a
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 13 Jan 2002:
All would be better served to either answer his questions, express
you counter opinion once, then go on to new subjects. Or (to
yourself, roll your eyes and
to *triple*-check Marketing's expense accounts.
Procurement: It seems the Sun currently has a monopoly on free light,
and its reliability has been called into question regularly. Service
during supposedly up times is also subject to random interruption by
things called clouds.
Can Finance
Christopher Jahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And it came to pass that Francesco wrote:
I have problems with some Java Applets and the Javasoft JRE.
Is there an alternative JVM to use with Mozilla? The problem
is that many applets are designed to
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:40:42 +0100, Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
cw wrote:
Hey there, just a comment.
This is regarding the win32 build. Basically I have noticed that
whenever you right click in the address bar, Mozilla automatically
selects the whole line. Sometimes I only want to copy out
Hello!
I'm writing a plugin for Netscape (I'm using version 6). I have ported it
from my ActiveX control.
It works well by itself, but it has no communication with Netscape. As I
read in Netscape's documentation about writing plugins, a LiveConnect is
used to provide a communication by using
Damien Covey wrote:
Blake Ross wrote:
This is a petition to fire David Hyatt for his crimes against the
World Wide Web, namely his implementation of automatic favicon
retrieval. Sign your name here and I will pass this on to Steve Case.
Is this some joke that normal guys just dont get ?
People have asked this before, and the answer given has been to do a
custom installation where you don't install MailNews(ie if it doesn't
have the option than it has to fall back on the system default e-mail
program)
Jelmer wrote:
Hi,
I use Netscape 6.2 on RedHat 7.2, and when i click
Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Sören Kuklau wrote:
I just asked whether people agreed so I could find out whether there
generally is interest - which there is, seemingly even by mozilla.org
staff
(Gerv). As soon as I
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
David Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 14:12:10 -0600,
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Sören Kuklau wrote:
: True. I'm not gonna defend the favicon behaviour, but I also consider
it
: futile to
You don't :-) Reread my post, I think you misinterpreted it.
Blake
I downloaded Netscape 6.21. The only program I use is the mail. Is there
anyway to delte everything and just keep the mail exe? Or just download
the mail? Do not have that much hard drive space. Thanks.
Gervase Markham wrote:
Oh, I also got some motion happening on relicensing with my Licensing
Statistics posts. And got the ball rolling on perfomance criteria for
the 1.0 release. But who's counting?
As the person who actually did the work for relicensing, I can say with
certainty that
Ian Davey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 14 Jan 2002:
Damien Covey wrote:
Blake Ross wrote:
This is a petition to fire David Hyatt for his crimes against the
World Wide Web, namely his implementation of automatic favicon
retrieval. Sign your
Java is very fast in mozilla using latest plugin ( jdk 1.4 beta)- faster in
fact than the 1.1 java in older netscapes.
jon wrote:
Yeah, this is a problem. Moz uses Sun's Java plugin, and it's really
slow. When I configure IE to use Sun's plugin, it's just as slow if not
slower than Moz when
Travis Crump wrote:
Jelmer wrote:
[...] i want to use another email-program [...]
People have asked this before, and the answer given has been to do a
custom installation where you don't install MailNews(ie if it doesn't
have the option than it has to fall back on the system default
Francesco wrote:
email their webmaster to not code java using m$'s VM- that defeats their
purpose.
Christopher Jahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
And it came to pass that Francesco wrote:
I have problems with some Java Applets and the Javasoft JRE.
Is
What u mean of system default?
gnome default email handler?
Travis Crump wrote:
People have asked this before, and the answer given has been to do a
custom installation where you don't install MailNews(ie if it doesn't
have the option than it has to fall back on the system default e-mail
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Damien Covey wrote:
Is this some joke that normal guys just dont get ?
Unfortunately not.
Netscape has fired David Hyatt over the weekend, to further distance
themselves from the favicon controversy.
We all wish him the best and hope that he will be able to
dman84 wrote:
print preview: good.
printing: getting better, dont know how, but its got a few problems still.
Both are totally fubar on linux. Zero progress in the last year.
Title: 2002³â â¾÷°ú ºÎ¾÷ÀÇ ¼º°øºñÁö´Ï½º ÀÎÅͳݼîÇθô - ¸¸¹°»ó
"55¸¸¿øÀ̸é Á¤¸» ±¦ÂúÀº ÀÎÅͳݼîÇθôÀ» ²Ù¹Ì½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù!!"
< ÀüȹøÈ£ : 02-3431-8100 (´ëÇ¥) 02-404-6288/9 (Á÷Åë)
´ã´çÀÚ : ÃÖ±¤¿õÆÀÀå >
And it came to pass that dman84 wrote:
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that Peter Lairo wrote:
Bill Lee wrote:
This is an instance where the analytical mind of the
programmers took precedent over the users.
No, once we have titletips, te value of using this
abbreviated
And it came to pass that Scott I. Remick wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
As far as I know, the calendar component was donated to
mozilla.org a month or two ago.
Calendar was written by OEone for their internet PC (which
runs Mozilla), correct?
And it came to pass that Yeh You-Ying wrote:
Hello,
I knew that the newer release of Mozilla 0.9.7+ gets this
feature. But, is it possible to make a utility, not built-in
one, which can parse the Mozilla AddressBook and export out
to different formats ? It will be useful to backup before
Hello everybody
Dont understand what the hackslashing here is about, but there is indeed
a download problem. I encountered one today and it was quickly clear
what was the cause: the interim-file (mashinegenerated name).(extension)
is stored in the system's TEMP dirctory which is say on drive
be some sort of installation mechanism, either internal or
external to Mozilla, but for the life of me I can't seem to
pin it down.
Or am I supposed to take the file contents and install by hand?
(And if so, is there documentation on the procedure?)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) I can see no need for a interim-file.
The download starts before the user clicks OK in the filepicker.
Would you know another way to get this effect without a file in the temp
directory?
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
Robert Huff wrote:
Someone wrote an interesting add-on which I'd like to install. So I
downloaded a .xpi file and ... now what?
Open the file in Mozilla
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that Scott I. Remick wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
As far as I know, the calendar component was donated to
mozilla.org a month or two ago.
Calendar was written by OEone for their internet PC (which
runs
Is there available any official Mozilla banner? Like those 'Get Netscape
NOW' :)
I made one, but it's ugly :( ...but feel free to use it :)
Btw, could somebody please give me a hint on how to generate a new
profile (so far only one)? Thanks! Moz is cunning enough to find and
copy old Netscape data but seems to do so only once.
- Wolf
Roope Lehmuslehto wrote:
Is there available any official Mozilla banner? Like those 'Get Netscape
NOW' :)
[GIVE TO THE CODE]
m o z i l l a d o t b a n n e r s : http://mozilla.org/banners/
[AND THE CODE WILL GIVE TO YOU]
--
/Jonas
Christian Biesinger wrote:
b) I can see no need for a interim-file.
The download starts before the user clicks OK in the filepicker.
Would you know another way to get this effect without a file in the temp
directory?
Try reading news://news.mozilla.org:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
/Jonas
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
b) I can see no need for a interim-file.
The download starts before the user clicks OK in the filepicker.
Would you know another way to get this effect without a file in the
temp directory?
Try reading
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
[GIVE TO THE CODE]
m o z i l l a d o t b a n n e r s : http://mozilla.org/banners/
[AND THE CODE WILL GIVE TO YOU]
Never seen before, they're very cool, but... all GIFs!!!
Andrea
--
Andrea Monni [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is our choices, Harry, that
Y! IM:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
b) I can see no need for a interim-file.
The download starts before the user clicks OK in the filepicker.
Would you know another way to get this effect without a file in the
temp directory?
Try reading news://news.mozilla.org:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have
Hope I've found the right place for this...
If you go to
http://ffm.junetz.de/members/jh/english/drewe/intro.html
you'll see a page that validates HTML 4.01 Transitional, at least
according to the W3C validator. Even though, the CSS linked in the
source code seems not to be read or interpreted
That explains why my badge doesn't work any more!
Jeremy M. Dolan wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Damien Covey wrote:
Is this some joke that normal guys just dont get ?
Unfortunately not.
Netscape has fired David Hyatt over the weekend, to further distance
themselves from the
b) I can see no need for a interim-file.
The download starts before the user clicks OK in the filepicker.
Would you know another way to get this effect without a file in the temp directory?
This makes it indeed a bit more untrivial, but I see possibilities.
First, I would like to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) I can see no need for a interim-file.
The download starts before the user clicks OK in the filepicker.
Would you know another way to get this effect without a file in the
temp directory?
First, I would like to support the view of Mr. ? that this function
Jens Hatlak wrote:
I read about external style sheets
requiring the web server to send CSS files as MIME type text/css, but
that was only for HTML 4.01 Strict. :-/
No. For every Doctype which triggers strict standards compliant mode,
which is mostly the ones with an URL, as in your page.
Please stop posting with your old netscape.com address. You're an
embarrassment to the company.
Thanks,
Blake
David Hyatt wrote:
That explains why my badge doesn't work any more!
Jeremy M. Dolan wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Damien Covey wrote:
Is this some joke that normal
Vincent Nicolas wrote:
It is nevertheless strange that MS JVM is so quicker than Sun one !
Sun has created Java but they are not very good so develop a decent JVM...
Please, M. Sun, do something !
Quicker? Maybe, maybe not. I have no data. However, the MS one is
_not_ a decent JVM, as it
But back to technical issues, with only little effort I could
implement an intelligent storing interface that tries to keep received
data in RAM as long as possible and the destination is unknown,
How about this?
While the dialog box is up begin saving the file to some temporary
place.
Christian Biesinger wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) I can see no need for a interim-file.
The download starts before the user clicks OK in the filepicker.
Would you know another way to get this effect without a file in the
temp directory?
First, I would like to support the
Sören Kuklau wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
David Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 14:12:10 -0600,
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Sören Kuklau wrote:
[snip]
Why would I want to base a project on something as wildly
Blake Ross wrote:
You don't :-) Reread my post, I think you misinterpreted it.
Blake
Who doesn't what now? Sorry Blake, you'll have to give me a bit more
context than that. Or does Mozilla have an over-snipping defect too?
See your post. Then see mine. It shouldn't be hard to follow...
I wonder what sort of sad, lonely life you must lead where people's
blood boils with rage over newsgroup posts. Life's too short to care
that much about something so trivial in the end.
---
Blake
:: Fire Dave Hyatt! ::
JTK
Eric Vaandering wrote:
dman84 wrote:
print preview: good.
printing: getting better, dont know how, but its got a few problems
still.
Both are totally fubar on linux. Zero progress in the last year.
Well I mean come on now, it's only been a year! It's not like they
haven't
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Sören Kuklau wrote:
What image format would you use? GIF? Sorry, licensing issues. JPEG?
Sorry,
quality issues. PNG? Sorry, IE has alpha and gamma channel issues.
Something
else? Sorry, won't comply
Well I mean come on now, it's only been a year! It's not like they
haven't been working on all kinds of other stuff, such as... well
there's the... um... oh! There's a context menu now! That's what took
a year! Yeah, see, they were working on it all year, and I just
happened to
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Roope Lehmuslehto wrote:
Is there available any official Mozilla banner? Like those 'Get
Netscape NOW' :)
[GIVE TO THE CODE]
m o z i l l a d o t b a n n e r s : http://mozilla.org/banners/
[AND THE CODE WILL GIVE TO YOU]
That or any other Stalinist
Blake Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Well I mean come on now, it's only been a year! It's not like they
haven't been working on all kinds of other stuff, such as... well
there's the... um... oh! There's a context menu now!
Blake Ross wrote:
See your post. Then see mine. It shouldn't be hard to follow...
Yeah, like that. See, that's even easier than snipping all that truth
that makes you so angry, isn't it Blake? Just remember, it's for the
good of the code. Yeah, and that may not always be for the good
or, if you want to save some time, you'll use the undocumented method of
dropping a file called 'favicon.ico' into the root directory of your site.
it can be any format mozilla supports (gif, png, etc) as long as it's
called favicon.ico. However, if you want the icon to show up in Internet
Yeah, like that. See, that's even easier than snipping all that truth
that makes you so angry, isn't it Blake?
Er...huh?
Just remember, it's for the
good of the code. Yeah, and that may not always be for the good of AOL.
If there's anyone your AOL rants aren't going to work on, it's
JTK wrote:
Or does Mozilla have an over-snipping defect too?
Yeah, Steve Case made me put it in.
Blake Ross wrote:
Please stop posting with your old netscape.com address. You're an
embarrassment to the company.
Didn't you get the memo? Replying to him is verboten. Replying makes it appear
as though at one time he may have been connected to the company.
Also, the name of the company is
I am rubber, you are glue. Nyah nyah nyah.
jesus X wrote:
Blake Ross wrote:
Please stop posting with your old netscape.com address. You're an
embarrassment to the company.
Didn't you get the memo? Replying to him is verboten. Replying makes it appear
as though at one time he may have
76% of respondents wanted Dave Hyatt to be fired.
21% of respondents wanted a more severe punishment.
- of these, 12% considered a lifetime of coding in only XBL as
adequate retribution.
The remaining 3% of respondents couldn't muster up anything more
intelligent than DOWN WITH
JTK wrote:
I bet even AOL themselves get more hits from IE ... than from Mozilla.
That's a pretty safe bet since the AOL client is IE.
--
Ian Hickson
Hyatt SUCKZ! AWAY WITH HIM!!! HE'S DEVIL ON EARTH!!
;-)
Blake Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
76% of respondents wanted Dave Hyatt to be fired.
21% of respondents wanted a more severe punishment.
- of these, 12%
JTK wrote:
Mozilla contiues to be a non-entity as far as the web is concerned
Google hits for Mozilla on the web: 3,970,000
Google hits for Internet Explorer on the web: 3,460,000
Non-entity indeed.
(Nice spelling by the way. Do you have to take lessons, or does it come
naturally?)
--
Ian
JTK wrote:
Oh, I also got some motion happening on relicensing with my Licensing
Statistics posts.
Didn't last long, did it? Did you find it too much effort?
--
Ian Hickson
Blake Ross wrote:
76% of respondents wanted Dave Hyatt to be fired.
21% of respondents wanted a more severe punishment.
- of these, 12% considered a lifetime of coding in only XBL as
adequate retribution.
Huh? But I thought the plan was to back out XBL completely! That's what
Jon Krivitzky wrote:
Is there a reference of the Venkman commands somewhere? That would be
fabulous and a great help.
Err, not as far as I'm aware of. There are a few docs at Venkman's
project page: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/venkman/. Typing help
into the Venkman console also
cr wrote:
How about this?
While the dialog box is up begin saving the file to some temporary
place. If the file system runs out of space, just pause the download
at this point.
If the temporary place is on the same disk/partition/whatever as
whatever the system uses for ITS temporary
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Blake Ross wrote:
76% of respondents wanted Dave Hyatt to be fired.
21% of respondents wanted a more severe punishment.
- of these, 12% considered a lifetime of coding in only XBL as
adequate retribution.
Huh? But I thought
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Christopher Rued wrote:
Gervase Markham wrote:
to *triple*-check Marketing's expense accounts.
Procurement: It seems the Sun currently has a monopoly on free light,
and its reliability has been called into question regularly. Service
during supposedly up
gavin long wrote:
cr wrote:
How about this?
While the dialog box is up begin saving the file to some temporary
place. If the file system runs out of space, just pause the download
at this point.
If the temporary place is on the same disk/partition/whatever as
whatever the system
I am confused. Isn't mozilla writing to whatever partition the
temporary data is stored(ie /tmp) while the system stores its temporary
data in RAM and on the swap partition(Windows similarly segregates
virtual memory if I am not mistaken)...
gavin long wrote:
cr wrote:
How about this?
Ian Hickson wrote:
JTK wrote:
Mozilla contiues to be a non-entity as far as the web is concerned
Google hits for Mozilla on the web: 3,970,000
99.44% of which begin: Why is Mozilla so slow/not 1.0 yet/not really
Open/crashing on me all the time/a commie sympathizer/showing me CNN
from
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that dman84 wrote:
Christopher Jahn wrote:
And it came to pass that Peter Lairo wrote:
Bill Lee wrote:
This is an instance where the analytical mind of the
programmers took precedent over the users.
No, once we have titletips,
INCREASE
YOUR PENIS SIZE BY 1 ...2 ...3 ...
OR MORE IN JUST A FEW SHORT WEEKS!
Former Viagra pharmacist has now created a
revolutionary herbal pill that is guaranteed to increase your penis size by
1 ...2 ...3 ... or more in just a few short
How do I write a javascript statement that writes to the javascript
console? Something like:
debug( my favorite number is + x );
===
my favorite number is 6
Thank you.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 07:28:39PM +0100, Andrea Monni wrote:
Never seen before, they're very cool, but... all GIFs!!!
Conversion should be easy. On my non-multimedia-oriented box, I have these
gif conversion commands:
/usr/bin/gif2tiff
/usr/bin/gif2epsn
/usr/bin/gif2ps
/usr/bin/gif2rgb
Christopher Jahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
And it came to pass that Yeh You-Ying wrote:
Hello,
I knew that the newer release of Mozilla 0.9.7+ gets this
feature. But, is it possible to make a utility, not built-in
one, which can parse the Mozilla
I created some test software to test a web server's specialized back-end
some time ago. The concept is very simple. Port 80 is snooped on
the server and packets are saved into a file. I use a web client to
access the server and exercise the server during which the client
requests are
Chris Hoess wrote:
- of these, 12% considered a lifetime of coding in only XBL as
adequate retribution.
Huh? But I thought the plan was to back out XBL completely! That's what
bug 50349 is all about, and I thought it was going to happen soon, since
the bug is assigned to...
I found a new Eskimo theme posted at
http://www.xulplanet.com/downloads/view.cgi?category=skinsview=all
This brings the current total to 9 (including Classic and Modern).
Thank you to those willing to continue plugging away creating themes for
the ever-changing Mozilla.
The limits for Bookmarks will be corrected in the next release.
Andrew Mutch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Melissa Liberty - Colorado) wrote in message
news:3c425abc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
There are also other, faster browsers based on the Mozilla
Dave Morse wrote:
How do I write a javascript statement that writes to the javascript
console? Something like:
debug( my favorite number is + x );
===
my favorite number is 6
Thank you.
I think this is the wrong newsgroup (unless Mozilla makes you do things
completely differently),
cannot cite your text in Mozilla 0.97
Thanks, that's what I had in mind, more analytical. The interim space
could be on a drive (TEMP again) or in memory, which latter I preferred
for the problems mentioned above. I don't see any practical problem as
the space is used only a short time and
I am confused. Isn't mozilla writing to whatever partition the temporary data is
stored(ie /tmp) while the system stores its temporary data in RAM and on the swap
partition(Windows similarly segregates virtual memory if I am not mistaken)...
That is quite right. In Windows both facilities
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 07:46:04 +0100,
Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:I admit this is a minor issue, but not totally irrelevant. After all, is
:this intricate function not in truth an issue of developers' pride? See
:what we have accomplished! Has ever any (non-developing) user asked for
:it?
Dave Morse wrote:
How do I write a javascript statement that writes to the javascript
console? Something like:
Make sure the following checkbox is ticked:
Edit Preferences Debug Enable JavaScript dump() output
And then in your JS, do:
dump(my favorite number is + x + \n);
The string
91 matches
Mail list logo
