Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
> Do Opera and IE even support "position: fixed"?
Opera 5.12 [win32] does a great job. Visit the CSS homepage and you'll
see what I mean.
IE 5.x does not, but I hear IE 6.0 does to a limited extent. Couldn't
confirm this as I will not be installing it, and none of
Garth Wallace wrote:
> Jason Antony wrote:
>
>>Also, kindly trim quoted messages while replying
>
> I thought it was best to keep the whole
> quote so people could check back and
> verify my argument.
Yes I understand, but this is also a newsgroup [as well as a mail
hi
testers may have noticed that past builds would grind to a near slow
halt, but stay afloat when visiting the w3c CSS homepage:
http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/
The current win32 build [Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US;
rv:0.9.5+) Gecko/20011108] crashes.
I have also noticed that fixed el
Travis Crump wrote:
>
> The commands in the Search menu work for me with same build[20011108] on
> Windows 2000 although the latest nightly is technically 20011109 so if
> you are talking about that build than I don't know...
Good heavens. 20011109 is out, indeed.
Yep, just download and ins
Robert Pollak wrote:
>
> Please avoid personal attacks or offenses. In this
> case it would be better to let the thread die.
True. Also, kindly trim quoted messages while replying, like Robert did.
The news server connection is *extremely* slow, even from my uni's T1
connection. Anything ov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
OK all
Here is a quicklist of bugs I've found in the past few weeks, mostly
confined to the PREFERENCES menu.
I tried Bugzilla's query engine but it drove me bugshit, so I am
submitting these for your review before I commit them as bugs.
Tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
> IE5 (on MacOS 9 at least) has a bug where it doesn't display properly
> formatted XHTML 1.0 To get this behaviour on windows, you have to
> give the file a .xml extension.
To see this in action, visit this XHTML 1.0
