Jonathan Wilson wrote:
>> 1. ActiveX support
>>
>> Why? There are certain web sites that can only be viewed by Internet
>> Explorer 4.0 and higher. And this can be a real big inconvenience for
>> those who really loathe IE such as myself and over 40 million others!
>> That way, we can tear down
Robert Zaichkowski wrote:
> Good evening!
>
> For Netscape 6.x and Mozilla 0.9.x, I have come up with the demand for
> the following features :
>
This is just what MS wants - Mozilla locked in a race
to "keep up" with IE.
Chris Hill wrote:
> On 27 Nov 2001 03:41:35 GMT, DeMoN LaG wrote:
>
>>They are as secure as fort knox compared to Active X
>>
>>
>
> Please explain
>
You have to actually download and install them
before they do anything. ActiveX can install
things without you even knowing.
Net_Test wrote:
>
> Or perhaps, is there a program that downloads from servers
> but does not cache?
>
http://www.getright.com/
Joe Cuervo wrote:
> Net_Test wrote:
>
>>
>> Or perhaps, is there a program that downloads from servers
>> but does not cache?
>>
>
>
> http://www.getright.com/
>
...but yeah, downloading the file to a temp directory
then copying it from there is a bad idea.
