Re: tab icons

2001-11-12 Thread LemNet.com Support
barney wrote: > Is there a way to turn off displaying the bookmark icon in tabs? I > personally don't have any use for them and they just take up space. I'd > rather see more of the page title. Or should I file a bug? Its so that when a site has a favicon, it can be shown somewhere. I don't t

Re: Mozilla or KDE-browser(Konqueror)?

2001-11-12 Thread LemNet.com Support
Roland wrote: > Hello, > if I wanted to join a browser programming team now, where should I go? To > Mozilla.org or KDE(Konqueror), or maybe another open source browser? > Sometimes I think I would like to contribute but I don't know if I will > have the time. > > Of course I know that this

Re: Unexpected Mozilla vendor: lastminute.com

2001-11-13 Thread LemNet.com Support
David Gerard wrote: > running a September 2001 build of Mozilla. Cool :-) Running a nightly build you mean? I wonder why they didn't choose the latest milestone. Was this a customized build to stop people going to other sites? Ian

Re: favicon

2001-11-17 Thread LemNet.com Support
Pratik wrote: > This is really offtopic but I thought I'd mention. With the latest > nightlies I notice some interesting things. Just go to the following sites > > - http://money.cnn.com > - http://www.ups.com > - http://www.vw.com > > All have Netscape logo as favicon. My guess is that Netsca

Re: Where do "favicons" come from?

2001-11-19 Thread LemNet.com Support
Mike Mimic wrote: > Hi! > > But does Netscape 6.2 support favicons? > > I have tryed with cnn and some of the urls which have been posted and > none of them displayed an icon next to the URL. > > > Mike No, favicons came between Mozilla 0.9.5 and 0.9.6 Netscape 6.2 is based off Mozilla 0.9.4

Re: build numbering system

2001-11-21 Thread LemNet.com Support
S11001001 wrote: > DeMoN LaG wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > >>For instance, I just installed today's latest nightly: >>2001112003 >>Translates to roughly November 20, 2001 at 3 am >> > > Speaking of which, why does mozillazine point to 2001112008 even > though 2001112108 is

Re: Buggy Mozilla/Software Need Auto-Save in Email

2001-11-27 Thread LemNet.com Support
Sam S. Onite wrote: > Thanks for the link. > > I wasn't sure if "bug" was the right term so I didn't think of looking > in the bug list. > > :) > s. Everything goes in to bugzilla (RFEs - Requests for Enchacement and incompatabilities of specific sites included). Its worth getting yourself

Re: [mozilla.org] roadmap.html - tree management image is old

2001-12-08 Thread LemNet.com Support
RangeLife wrote: > The roadmap image in > http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html > refer to a pre 0.9.6 release > if someone in the crew is interested in, > i've moved the cross "we're here" > in the right place. > http://web.tiscali.it/Gloria/roadmap.png > > i hope this is a (very) little contribu

Re: Nice cache management

2001-12-14 Thread LemNet.com Support
JTK wrote: > Hey, did you guys know that the government found a videotape where bin > Laden admits to his terrorists attacks on 9-11? Yeah, I just read all > about it on CNN. They say they're going to probably release it Wednesday. > > Wednesday as in yesterday. > > Thank God Mozilla's cach

Re: IE chrome for mozilla

2001-12-18 Thread LemNet.com Support
Sören Kuklau wrote: > Well to Taras: K-Meleon looks a bit like IE (and is intended to do so), and > has the Gecko engine from Mozilla. But an IE chrome... I wonder if anyone > would do such a thing (definitly not Netscape, Beonex, etc., and most likely > not mozilla.org guys or volunteers). Actu

Re: Document write problem

2001-12-20 Thread LemNet.com Support
Fred Figueiredo wrote: > After this I call a funcion that does: > > main.document.t.value="hello"; > ... Is t an element (ie using document.all)? If so, you should be doing main.document.getElementById('t').value="hello"; Ian