Re: [OFF-TOPIC]Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh?

2001-09-17 Thread Gervase Markham
>>>No. In other words, I don't need to do a bunch of research to know the >>>US is not responsible for the rest of the worlds hunger, disease and >>>poverty as hinted to by the tone of the original posters statment. >>> >>It's certainly not responsible for all of it. But it is certainly >>respons

Re: [OFF-TOPIC]Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh?

2001-09-17 Thread Ben Ruppel
Go choke on a grapefruit! So America should A) save everyone else from famine, disease, genocide, etc... but B) we should not meddle in other nations' affairs. Mama Cass wrote: > In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Warren Bell say these > wise words: > > >>Mama Cass wrote:

Re: [OFF-TOPIC]Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh?

2001-09-17 Thread Warren Bell
Gervase Markham wrote: > > > No. In other words, I don't need to do a bunch of research to know the > > US is not responsible for the rest of the worlds hunger, disease and > > poverty as hinted to by the tone of the original posters statment. > > It's certainly not responsible for all of it. B

Re: [OFF-TOPIC]Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh?

2001-09-17 Thread Gervase Markham
> No. In other words, I don't need to do a bunch of research to know the > US is not responsible for the rest of the worlds hunger, disease and > poverty as hinted to by the tone of the original posters statment. It's certainly not responsible for all of it. But it is certainly responsible for

Re: [OFF-TOPIC]Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh?

2001-09-17 Thread Warren Bell
Garth Wallace wrote: > > > > > > This is a naive view. You could probably do a fair amount of self > > > educating on the Internet if you're interested. > > > > I'm not. > > In other words, "I'm ignorant, but I won't let that stop me from > stating my opinions as if they were facts." No. In o

Re: [OFF-TOPIC]Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh?

2001-09-17 Thread Warren Bell
Mama Cass wrote: > > In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Warren Bell say these > wise words: > > >> This is a naive view. You could probably do a fair amount of self > >> educating on the Internet if you're interested. > >> > > > > I'm not. > > Typical American insular Attitude

Re: [OFF-TOPIC]Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh?

2001-09-16 Thread Emlyn
/me runs for cover.

Re: [OFF-TOPIC]Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh?

2001-09-16 Thread David Gerard
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:01:49 -0400, Ben Ruppel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :Funny, you know those people who are starving in the desert? Maybe it's :because they're living in the freakin' desert! Bad water, no water? Is :this the result of US foreign policy? No, this is how things were and

Re: [OFF-TOPIC]Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh?

2001-09-16 Thread Warren Bell
Asa Dotzler wrote: > > Warren Bell wrote: > > > Asa Dotzler wrote: > > > >>Warren Bell wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>There is hunger and starvation around the world. Although that's sad, > >>>we did not cause it. > >>> > >>I am in not interested in the discussion of recent terrorist activities > >

Re: [OFF-TOPIC]Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh?

2001-09-16 Thread Ben Ruppel
Funny, you know those people who are starving in the desert? Maybe it's because they're living in the freakin' desert! Bad water, no water? Is this the result of US foreign policy? No, this is how things were and probably have been for a long time. Should the US help? Yes. Has the US he

Re: [OFF-TOPIC]Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh?

2001-09-16 Thread Warren Bell
Asa Dotzler wrote: > > Warren Bell wrote: > > > > There is hunger and starvation around the world. Although that's sad, > > we did not cause it. > > I am in not interested in the discussion of recent terrorist activities > but I am curious if you're really sure that the United States has neve