Bart Meerdink wrote:
It would probably be a good business proposition for AOL/TW to let
Mozilla find its own course with less pressure, buy Opera Software A/S,
and let them customize Opera to get the top-quality browser they so long
waited for.
Is this a troll to raise the stock value
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
Is this a troll to raise the stock value of Opera Software A/S?
Seems a bit offtopic to me, but AFAIK there is no Opera stockprice (if
you're from Norway you surely are better informed than I am).
And to me, to judge Mozilla next to Opera with respect to all kinds of
Alex wrote:
I have seen a lot of concern about these regressions, and at the same
time we've been seeing the tree whacked with a lot of major landings in
the past 6 weeks, looks to me to be the likely culprit. I've heard that
some fairly significant landings have already been delayed to
Hi!
Bart Meerdink wrote:
Maybe this is flamebait in this newsgroup, but that's not my intention.
People who have tried Opera on Linux migtht ask themselves if Opera
isn't a lot closer to what Mozilla should be than Mozilla itself (wrt
functionality, I'm not speaking about the open
Bart Meerdink wrote:
Maybe this is flamebait in this newsgroup, but that's not my intention.
Too bad. This is not only a flamebait, it is also an insult to the project.
Fabian.
People who have tried Opera on Linux migtht ask themselves if Opera
isn't a lot closer to what Mozilla
Thanks for your constructive reply!
Christian Mattar wrote:
So, who defines what Mozilla should be? The Slashdot-crowd? The
End-User? Web-designers? You?
Well, I asked the readers here at n.p.mozilla.general. But I would say
that IE is still the main reference, with addition of mail/news
Fabian Guisset wrote:
Bart Meerdink wrote:
Maybe this is flamebait in this newsgroup, but that's not my intention.
Too bad. This is not only a flamebait, it is also an insult to the project.
Fabian.
We, as public testers, are constantly told upon complaining/reporting
problems:
My concern is, that there seems to be little concern for the reasons
behind these regressions (amount of coupling, tolerance for 'shortcuts'
and varying programming practices). I always must think of the
relentless auditing of Theo de Raadt and his OpenBSD collegues.
But in the end I'm
Bill Lee wrote:
Fabian Guisset wrote:
Bart Meerdink wrote:
Maybe this is flamebait in this newsgroup, but that's not my intention.
Too bad. This is not only a flamebait, it is also an insult to the project.
Fabian.
We, as public testers, are constantly told upon
