Roland Mainz wrote:
>
> Noone prevents you from creating a "tracker" bug...
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68427
Clarence
Gervase Markham wrote:
> > I took the liberty to convert the HTML-file into plaintext, so we can
> > comment on this in the newsgroup.
>
> This would be _so_ much easier to keep track of if each recommendation was
> a separate bug...
Noone prevents you from creating a "tracker" bug...
[snip]
Hi!
Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> > After reading W3C's "Common User Agent Problems"
> > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-cuap-20010206) - which of these "issues"
> > are (still) present in your Zilla ?
>
> There is now a bug filed on each recommendation in this document. The
> meta-bug is http://b
> After reading W3C's "Common User Agent Problems"
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-cuap-20010206) - which of these "issues"
> are (still) present in your Zilla ?
There is now a bug filed on each recommendation in this document. The
meta-bug is http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68427 .
> I took the liberty to convert the HTML-file into plaintext, so we can
> comment on this in the newsgroup.
This would be _so_ much easier to keep track of if each recommendation was
a separate bug...
> > Put the target location at a consistent location in the viewport (e.g.,
> > at the top of
Christian Mattar wrote:
>
> > 1. Usability
> > 1.1 When the user follows a link to a target anchor, highlight the
> > target location.
>
> > Techniques:
> >
> > Put the target location at a consistent location in the viewport (e.g.,
> > at the top of a graphical viewport). Allow configuration to
Christian Mattar wrote:
>
> I don't understand how this is supposed to work.
> Perhaps the location where the anchor would lead to could blink on the
> scrollbar.
Does Mozilla still allow javascript to overwrite this location? If so,
putting the js status message somewhere else (so the target is
Hi!
> After reading W3C's "Common User Agent Problems"
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-cuap-20010206) - which of these "issues"
> are (still) present in your Zilla ?
I took the liberty to convert the HTML-file into plaintext, so we can
comment on this in the newsgroup.
If you know any bug numb
Gervase Markham wrote:
> > After reading W3C's "Common User Agent Problems"
> > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-cuap-20010206) - which of these "issues"
> > are (still) present in your Zilla ?
>
> It would be good if someone would take the initiative, and go through that
> document thoroughly an
> After reading W3C's "Common User Agent Problems"
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-cuap-20010206) - which of these "issues"
> are (still) present in your Zilla ?
It would be good if someone would take the initiative, and go through that
document thoroughly and file RFE bugs on stuff we don't do
Hi !
After reading W3C's "Common User Agent Problems"
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-cuap-20010206) - which of these "issues"
are (still) present in your Zilla ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/O /==\ O\ MPEG speciali
11 matches
Mail list logo
