Peter Lairo wrote:
> Woa, let's not throw-out-the-baby-with-the-bathwater. Most people
> understand "soft returns" from their word processor (hopefully not M$
> word :) ) because they can see the text *flow* as they type.
I'm just saying what most newbies tell me. They hate it that their
Nets
Holger Metzger wrote:
> Peter Lairo wrote:
>>agreed, it is very confusing to the author how quoting and linewrapping
>>will turn up at the recipient's end.
> That's why I sincerly think that there should be an UI option to at
> least disable the display of format=flowed.
>
> Many many newbies
Peter Lairo wrote:
> agreed, it is very confusing to the author how quoting and linewrapping
> will turn up at the recipient's end.
That's why I sincerly think that there should be an UI option to at
least disable the display of format=flowed.
Many many newbies keep asking me why Netscape 6.1
Gervase Markham wrote:
> It's a very big issue, because it makes me want to throw up every time I
> use Mozilla's mail editor. Does no-one here have any sense of aesthetics?
agreed, it is very confusing to the author how quoting and linewrapping
will turn up at the recipient's end.
Mozilla s
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And it's not a real big issue anyway, since Mozilla wraps quoted text
> > absolutely fine when it sends.
>
> It's a very big issue, because it makes me want to throw up every time I
> use Mozilla's mail editor. Do
Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> > And it's not a real big issue anyway, since Mozilla wraps quoted text
> > absolutely fine when it sends.
>
> It's a very big issue, because it makes me want to throw up every time I
> use Mozilla's mail editor. Does no-one here have any sense of aesthetics?
>
Only t
> And it's not a real big issue anyway, since Mozilla wraps quoted text
> absolutely fine when it sends.
It's a very big issue, because it makes me want to throw up every time I
use Mozilla's mail editor. Does no-one here have any sense of aesthetics?
Gerv
J.B. Moreno wrote:
> It's unlikely to be fixed anytime soon -- it is a side effect of doing
> something else right (live wrapping of non-quoted text), and a
> limitation on the rendering of the (internally used only) HTML that
> makes that possible. It's definitely been mentioned before, there m
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Henno Buschmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Holger Metzger wrote:
> > Mozilla wrapping is absolutely fine. No Outlook Expressish behaviour in
> > any way. It might appear that way while composing but Mozilla wraps all
> > quoted lines ok when sending.
>
Hi,
Holger Metzger wrote:
> Mozilla wrapping is absolutely fine. No Outlook Expressish behaviour in
> any way. It might appear that way while composing but Mozilla wraps all
> quoted lines ok when sending.
Yea, while composing it is horrible. So i changed it, but that is a
mistake.
But that sh
Henno Buschmann wrote:
> Henno Buschmann wrote:
>> > What part of the Mozilla archetecture is responsible for opening
>> > windows, setting up the HTMLDocument, returning the window object back
>> > to the requester, etc? I'm particularly interested in the JavaScript
>> > API implementation
Hallo,
Henno Buschmann wrote:
> > What part of the Mozilla archetecture is responsible for opening
> > windows, setting up the HTMLDocument, returning the window object back
> > to the requester, etc? I'm particularly interested in the JavaScript
> > API implementation.
^^ Oh, i see, i
Hi,
i have a problem with my Mozilla 0.93 News/Mailclient:
When i get a mail and want to reply i quote most of the text. But in
many cases it looks horrible (for example):
> What part of the Mozilla archetecture is responsible for opening
> windows, setting up the HTMLDocument, returning the
13 matches
Mail list logo
