Re: shouldn't we announce 0.9.3 on n.p.m.announce?

2001-08-05 Thread jesus X
Asa Dotzler wrote: > I'm not trustworthy ;) and I wanna stay that way. You spamming little troll! > Actually I guess I could add myself to the list. I've never really > needed it. I don't have the newsgroups skillz :) that endico and others > have so I've just left it up to them. Yeah, that pla

Re: shouldn't we announce 0.9.3 on n.p.m.announce?

2001-08-05 Thread Micah Harwell
> Surely .announce-ing is on the "list of important things to do when a > release is cut". > > (I'd do it myself but not my place.) Do you think it's strange that 0.7 was never announced in n.p.m.announce either? -- Micah Harwell Industrial Techware http://www.industrialtechware.com/

Re: shouldn't we announce 0.9.3 on n.p.m.announce?

2001-08-05 Thread jesus X
Asa Dotzler wrote: > just waiting for the moderators to moderate my post. Umm, shouldn't YOU already have moderator access? I mean, you're somewhat "influential" to the project (putting it mildly). Or are you not trustworthy? :) -- jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton

shouldn't we announce 0.9.3 on n.p.m.announce?

2001-08-05 Thread Luke
Surely .announce-ing is on the "list of important things to do when a release is cut". (I'd do it myself but not my place.) Luke