I've attached a testcase showing this behaviour, should I be filing this
as a bug or am I overlooking something.
If you want this to get any attention, you'd be far better off:
a) Making sure it has the correct DOCTYPE
b) Making sure it passes the W3C's Validator
c) Filing a bug in Bugzilla
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob Hoopman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been looking at this, glancing at it from the corners of my eyes,
put it away for a few days, printed it an put it under my pillow at
night, chanting black/white and other magic at it, stared at it some
more and finally
Ian Davey wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob Hoopman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Have you tried:
td img {vertical-align: bottom}
I have now and this does remove the extra pixels.
Thanks a bundle.
The default is baseline and would explain the extra pixels you are seeing.
I
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob Hoopman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The default is baseline and would explain the extra pixels you are seeing.
I thought this would not be an issue seeing that the td height attributes
exactly match the height of the images for that row.
It's an issue because it
Rob Hoopman wrote:
snip
I've attached a testcase showing this behaviour, should I be filing this
as a bug or am I overlooking something.
I've been at the screen for too long again, there should be one more
"/td/tbody/table" to properly close all tables in that file.
This does not change
