We have ranked the top ten traffic building sites on the web, these sites
have been ranked by our experts, our clients and by you our visitors. Come
to www.greatfreesite.net/bestten
One of the top ten sites, can even guarantee top placement on the top ten
search engines.
Our site has been
Dear Friend,
When I first receive this email, I didn't believe it at all!
Yes, I know what you are thinking. I never responded to one of
these before either. I receive this email a few more times and I
decided to try. I figure that if I give it a try, at least I
have one hope. And I never regre
Judson Valeski wrote:
> 2. What's in there? new memory cache and new disk cache; or just new disk?
HTTP is only using the disk cache at the moment, but the new memory cache is
in place (FTP is using it for caching directory info) and HTTP will begin
using it for non-persistable items very soon.
Not yet. The new and the old cache still live next to each other. When
we throw the switch for HTTP, we'll be able to remove the old cache
files.
-Gordon
Colin Blake wrote:
> How do the old cache files in a users profile get deleted? Is the new
> cache code smart enough to know when its run f
How do the old cache files in a users profile get deleted? Is the new
cache code smart enough to know when its run for the first time and at
that point nuke the old cache files?
Another weirdness...
I tested this one on a RH6.2 system:
mozilla-new-cache-opt-nosym-20010314-linux-rh62.tar.gz
Tried to load http://www.digitoday.no/dtno.nsf/wframe/allesaker
Very few of the images actually loaded. I then clicked a link to a story
on the page. That one too had problems fini
Hi Darin,
thanks for your response.
Darin Fisher wrote:
..
> Interesting... can you send me a sample URL that demonstrates this problem.
I think, others have already provided examples for that.
> Ok... please use about:cache to inspect the cached content for that
> ticker URL... when you pul
Nils Ellmenreich wrote:
> PS. this is with build 2001031609 UTC main trunk. I haven't checked out
> your bug fixes on the other branch. I do that now.
Oh well, I should have done so before the last posting. Your fixes solve
both problems that I reported in the first posting. The about:cache
entr
Chris Saari wrote:
> Did you guys go off on a branch? I'm updating my build and I want to
> run with the new cache again so I'm just making sure I've got the
> latest and greatest.
>
Yeah... actually we're on a branch while moz freezes for 0.8.1. Pull
netwerk/ with the tag MOZ_NEW_CACHE_2001
