Re: Password Protected Profiles

2001-06-01 Thread Jason Bassford
Anyway, as it pertains to this argument, I still tend to think that we can do without profile passwords: Anyone who knows how to set up a profile can figure out their own workaround - eg run windows in so-called multiuser mode with separate desktops, and add -P whoever to every shortcut to

Re: Password Protected Profiles

2001-06-01 Thread nospam
Jason Bassford wrote: However. I still argue for having them in place because I can easily imagine situations where it COULD help somebody with what they want. Just because *I* wouldn't use the feature is, AFAIK, not a very good reason to say that it shouldn't be made part of the

SSL Certificate Disappears - Need Help!

2001-06-01 Thread Mark Rinaldi
Hello, I'm having a problem with the certificate installation unexpectedly disappearing after utilizing the SSL connection once. I am using v4.75. The certificate installs properly and allows use one time but the next time the user goes to use it, it's missing. Reinstallation will allow the

Re: Password Protected Profiles

2001-06-01 Thread Chris Hill
On Fri, 01 Jun 2001 14:09:51 +0100, nospam@nospam wrote: When my wife comes into the room and takes over the browser and wants her own settings I have to lose my login sesion in the OS so she can switch browser profiles, bit of an overkill dont you think? You should try Windows XP. One of

Re: PSM stream converters question

2001-06-01 Thread Garth Wallace
Ben Bucksch wrote: Garth Wallace wrote: WRT http://www.mozilla.org/mailnews/compose_send_plugin_arch_notes.html Would it be possible to use this architecture There is no such architecture. It's just a bunch of quick notes about signed/encrpted mails. I know it isn't implemented