Jesse Ruderman wrote: >How about having a sublist to which users can send reports of new security >bugs, so not all members of the list have to recieve all the spam? > .../discussion.
Agreed. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> should be reserved for new reports, not used for long discussion. >Reporters are unlikely to care about the bug several months after it is >fixed, and are even less likely to care enough to ask permission to open it. > Ex-act-ly. >Reporters should have the *ability* to open bugs to the public, but they >should not be relied upon to make their bugs public several months after the >bugs are fixed. That responsibility should lie elsewhere (hi BenB). > Wave :).
