Michael Lefevre wrote:
On 2004-06-11, Jean-Marc Desperrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As 1.4.1 is it's most recent version publicly available
[snip]
Actually it's not - 1.4.2 was released a few weeks ago, and binaries are
available. Mozilla.org didn't make a big announcement because it's not
a bui
On 2004-06-16, Jean-Marc Desperrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Lefevre wrote:
>> On 2004-06-11, Jean-Marc Desperrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>As 1.4.1 is it's most recent version publicly available
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Actually it's not - 1.4.2 was released a few weeks ago, and bina
Rui Pedro Figueira Covelo wrote:
But was mozilla built thinking on security more than "user friendlyness"?
...
How about mozilla? Is security a primary goal?
In terms of goals, I'd perceive Mozilla as not
having a security goal. It's certainly
conscious of the security needs, and it takes
it fai
BRAUX Martial wrote:
Hi everybody !
I'm experiencing problems while creating a certificate.
Looks to me like you're trying to follow the instructions in chapter 12
of the printed O'Reilly book "Creating Applications with Mozilla".
Those instructions are flawed. Much (most?) of that chapter has be
Hi,
It occured to me that most of the extensions that I install for
firefox and thunderbird, I simply do it on trust. But can't someone do
something malicious with it (like, rm -f my home directory. etc)?
What are the potential security risks associated with the xpi based
installation mechanism?
