wylbur37 wrote:
Do you know of any decompiler that would, in effect,
convert a .class file back to a .java file?
http://kpdus.tripod.com/jad.html#general
___
Mozilla-security mailing list
Mozilla-security@mozilla.org
Robert Mohr wrote:
It's not the default and never will be, but you can set
'xpinstall.enabled' to false in about:config.
Or you go to edit/preferences/advanced/software installation and disable
it there...
___
Mozilla-security mailing list
[EMAIL
Christian Biesinger wrote:
I tried out signed scripts today, and have some problems.
Oh yeah, I tried one more thing, namely putting the test.html file on a
SSL server, but that didn't seem to work either - same problems as with
a non-ssl server.
Hello!
I tried out signed scripts today, and have some problems. Firstly, I
have created a HTML file (see below) which does
netscape.security.PrivilegeManager.enablePrivilege(UniversalXPConnect).
Then I put it in the directory pref and called this command:
./signtool -kbiesi -Zpref.jar pref
Christian Schuglitsch wrote:
I made the browsercheck at
http://www.heise.de/ct/browsercheck/n6demo1.shtml with my 1.0 RC1 on
Linux and could read all my files.
True. This is fixed in the most recent nightly, however.
Now give us that proof, how OpenSpource works and present us the RC2
Mitchell Stoltz wrote:
In general, you shouldn't write
applications that depend on referrer headers, because user agents can
always opt not to send them.
...or even send faked ones, so a referer is no real protection.
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
Beaumont Jones wrote:
i just starting using mac mozilla 0.9.9. is the encryption for sending
credit card info and that sort of stuff fairly secure? maybe this is a
dumb question, as i never really asked it about internet explorer. thanks!
The 128 bit SSL-encryption that's used for sending
Paulo Lopes wrote:
Is there a way to protect javascript code?
No and there can't be.
The browser must see the cleartext Javascript code to execute it, and if
the browser can decode it, a user can as well.
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve
ZZT wrote:
Hi,
as known PGP 6.58 dont brings plugins for netscape/mozilla. Is there
something reliable that I can use for doing PGP?
http://enigmail.mozdev.org might be what you want, but I do not know how
reliable it works.