On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:16:27AM -0800, KUROSAKA Teruhiko wrote: > They might be guilty. But I still don't understand > why Mozilla 1.2.1 had no problem with their site. > Do they simply check the browser name and versions > against their hard-coded list, rather than checking > the encription strenth through a dedicated API?
Mostlikely. Like I said, their brwoser checker is poorly written and not future proof. -- Hogarth http://mozilla.weebeastie.net/ RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!
