Gervase Markham wrote:
Ian G wrote:
Here's my view: we are already in State B.
Can you point to any financial losses caused by someone falsely trusting
certs issued by CAs trusted by Firefox?
In answer to your question, no. But this does not show
we are not in State B. As you've elided the def
Ian G wrote:
Here's my view: we are already in State B.
Can you point to any financial losses caused by someone falsely trusting
certs issued by CAs trusted by Firefox?
Enacting the
policy will IMHO make no difference to the state, because
we are already there. I would have thought that was
abu
Ian G wrote:
Nelson just posted a bug comment, but I think the
response and discussion of the points he raised
are too broad for that bug, so I'll move them here,
if nobody minds.
I have two points to make here - the reality of
the CA "trust" decision, and the goal.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https:/
Nelson just posted a bug comment, but I think the
response and discussion of the points he raised
are too broad for that bug, so I'll move them here,
if nobody minds.
I have two points to make here - the reality of
the CA "trust" decision, and the goal.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https://bugzilla.moz
