Hi all non-x86 people,
Non-x86 people will really have to check out the new quantize_xrpow
speedup. Depending on architecture it may/may not speed things up. You may
also be able to extend the number of compareval's to get even more speed. Try
it and see and give feedback.
later
mike
--
> I got an idea about this:
> surround uses phase information wich is stored in high freq.
> By default below 160k lame has a 16kHz cut-off, so those infos are lost.
> You should try with -k in encoding to see if it solves this effect.
>
You can also see if using -mf or -ms makes any difference.
I got an idea about this:
surround uses phase information wich is stored in high freq.
By default below 160k lame has a 16kHz cut-off, so those infos are lost.
You should try with -k in encoding to see if it solves this effect.
Regards,
Gabriel
- Original Message -
From: Mark Gilbert
Same effect happens if you turn on SRS in the Apple iMAC (Surround sound)
Sounds awful. This is with any MPEG encoder, not specifically LAME.
Mark.
>I did some listening tests last night using lame v3.13.
>I decompressed the mp3 files (using mpg123 0.59q) onto a CD and
>played them on a recent
>
> hi!
>
> is there any console-util to maximize (or amplify) the volume of a wav
> file?
sox is ideal for this - you can do other things too.
of course - it's be nice if somoen would implement a decent compressor algorithm for
sox.
Scott Manley (aka Szyzyg) /
hi!
is there any console-util to maximize (or amplify) the volume of a wav
file?
thanks in advance,
clemens
--
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Krammer Clemens, Vienna (wo er alles tat) | computer people
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |don'
