I've heard some time ago about a software (a plug-in for RealPlayer or something like
that) which enhance the sound quality of encoded music (.RA and .MP3) and it mostly
process a better phase between signals and generate 'supposed' harmonics. So I think
it's a common problem of audio encoding
>
> Mark, would you give me more detailed explanation about this?
> How can I reproduce this?
>
> Mark> For example, two identical signals, just
> Mark> phase shifted and with different low-level noise, can generate very
> Mark> different maximum values,
>
> --
> Naoki Shibata e-mail: [E
>
> > Which version are you using? Such a bug was fixed a few months
> > ago, but I just checked our change log and the fix was never
> > recorded, so I dont know exactly which version. It was an overflow
> > in one of the counters.
>
> I ran into it a couple of weeks ago, with a (mildly) old
> It's possible to call lame.exe multiple times without
> having the thing crash. Therefore it seems strange to
> me that one requirement for being part of the ACM
> (which is that multiple instances must be possible)
> is not met by Lame. I don't get it... Is it because
> the ACM uses a library i
--- Mathew Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's closer to a device driver than a library. Since
> there is only one
> instance of the driver in memory, there is only one
> instance of each static
> and global variable: if several processes use the
> driver at the same time,
> they have to sha
> From: "Shawn Riley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> It's possible to call lame.exe multiple times without having the thing
crash.
> Therefore it seems strange to me that one requirement for being part of
> the ACM (which is that multiple instances must be possible) is not met
> by Lame. I don't get it..
