[my opinion]
Believing OV, once mainstream, will not be slapped and crippled by lawsuits from
conventional music and distribution industry because it uses no
obvious patented material is plain out naive. There goes the biggest
advantage of this format.
[/my opinion]
Your other comments
BTW, please explain: am I allowed to report an OGG VORBIS bug just if
and when you ask me?
Please remember we didn't flame him for his critique on vorbis, we
flamed him for his presentation :) I think this might have got blown
out of proportion a bit due to lanugage issues.
I'm glad Roel has
If anyone interested in checking out what LAME is capable of, check
out realtime SHOUTcast broadcast plugin for AMP Radio.
you could have made one for icecast instead :)
jack.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Related question: wouldn't the experience accumulated in the Lame
project be useful for the ogg project (GPSYCHO,...) ? Couldn't Lame
and ogg cooperate ?
they already do. we all work for the same company, and for the same
goals. icecast, ogg, lame, and some other stuff are all part of the
haven't used those 2 earlier versions of Winamp for ages. So why would
Nullsoft (or whoever it is) abandon Fraunhofer for Nitrane?
Nitrane is based heavily on AMP. Or more accurately, it started as AMP.
It was supposedly rewritten and nitrane was "better".
In any case, Playmedia sued
LAME (LAME is After all a Mp3 Encoder)
I still like LAME (Lame ain't your momma's encoder)
jack.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
networks are measured with k = 1000.
storage is measured with k = 1024.
this is how it has traditionally been.
jack.
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Shawn Riley wrote:
Is 1 kilobit per second supposed to be 1024 bits per second, or 1000 bits per second?
Shawn
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list (
In mp3 audio it's 1000 bits per second, in Microsoft's media formats it's 1024
bits per second
mark told me it was so they could say they could say they took the same
amount of space (128kbps) even though they squeezed more data in there.
the cheaters.
jack.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list
I don't understand this? Did the physics change, or the human ear/brain?
No. They did not. But the research that the psychoacoustics most
encoders used is most likely wrong. Monty has spent a lot of time
researching psychoacoustics for vorbis, and has found lots of new research
that showed
wich stupidness are you reffering to?
Hahahah :)
There's lots of stupid things that mp3 does. It's just an old model
designed under considerations that aren't always valid anymore.
Mark has said a few times that there are several rather obvious things you
could change that may increase
10 matches
Mail list logo
