Istvan Varga wrote:
>> 130-150kbit? be aware that on better Q systems you hear a difference,
>> and imho it wouldn't be bad to get better quality at higher size.
>
>Then why not use mp2 at 384k ? Or even some lossless format ?
- Because mp2 is not free !
(I tried imedia QDesign, it needs to ins
Another good one :
http://www.pineusa.com/d'music/sm200c_features.htm
anything you need, but expansive... :(
---
Roger
---
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
-
Very good question !
I use CDex, but I don't see exactly the boxes corresponding
to the command-line options...
«««««««
Roger Meister
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
>> You can take the "p" as 1/x. Here x is s, so
>> kbps and kbit/s means the same.
Yes, and could also be written :
kbs (exponent: minus one)
>From rules used in biochemistry. (same rules?)
But in a book or Word, not in a mail
Roger
-
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3enc
he right question, any Pro has answers ?
Thanks, Roger Meister.
--
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
>I want to convert a CD to mp3 files with a good quality and a reasonable
>file size. I played around with the VBR setting and found that using the
>follwing switches ...
.
I am not a Pro, but have a similar question :
I use CDex including Lame 3.58, BUT only at 320
I use CDex including Lame 3.58, only at 320 bitrate
to get the best quality
>> Using 320kb/s you may as well use ADPCM format which is
>> built-in to most operating systems. MP2 produces
>> argueably better sound quality than MP3 over 256kb/s.
Thanks, I will work aro
