Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLVED!

2000-10-03 Thread Youri Pepplinkhuizen
Great! Just one thing - does the fact big_values is limited to 8192 now mean a loss of quality? Imposing a maximum value of 8191 is a completely unneeded restriction which results in a (very tiny) loss of quality. I don't get this, since apparantly, it is a needed restriction. Or is it

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp/100hz bug: SOLVED!

2000-10-03 Thread Youri Pepplinkhuizen
Hmmm, nah I don't think it should. If even the ISO source uses 8206, why change it when the Nitrane bug has already been fixed by Nullsoft? Also, how come only Nitrane is triggered by this setting? All other decoders work fine. It would seem like it, that using a value of 8191 is more of a

[MP3 ENCODER] Some suggestions for LAME - please review

2000-09-21 Thread Youri Pepplinkhuizen
Hi, I got some suggestions for LAME. They're not too complicated (probably are to implement, though), so here goes: - LAME VBR doesn't encode the LSB (Least Significant Bit) correctly (as described on http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~djmrob/mp3decoders/lsb.html) - what exactly is causing this and