[MP3 ENCODER] Time-stretching (off topic)

2000-09-14 Thread mailing-steve
Does anyone know a good technic/routine to time-stretch a buffer of audio data (mono channel) ? Is it better to resample the data according to the time-stretching ratio or is there some other/better technic ? Any info/link might be usefull (and sorry for the off topic, but lots of people seem to

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Correlation & mid/side

2000-09-08 Thread mailing-steve
>| Odesílatel: Steve Lhomme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >| >| Well, a pre-processor is what I'm programming. But you can't integrate >it >| with lame since it can't work in real-time/pipe (for DC adjust, trimmin >g, >| normalisation). > >You should add some filter processing, for example notch filters f

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] normalization

2000-09-05 Thread mailing-steve
Addition : I currently use a Windows shareware to do that. It's called 'WaveTrim' (or 'WavTrim') and works fine. >I'm currently doing a simple command-line program to do it, using >libsndfile. It will also trim files (remove blank in the beginning and end) >and adjust DC offset. > >I'll publish

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder

2000-08-28 Thread mailing-steve
>>I think the only way is to find every frame, and analyse the header. It will g>ive you the frame length with the formula mentionned earlier (sample_per_frame>/sampling_frequency). >>Otherwise, you'll be missing the VBR aspect of files (unless you can get the '>real' bit rate). > >Do you know o

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] mpglib layer I/II decoding

2000-08-21 Thread mailing-steve
>> :: I think for Layer I it's 384. >> :: >> MPEG-1 Layer I is 384 samples. MPEG-1 Layer II and III is 1152 samples. >> Values are halved for LSF. > >The number of samples is only halved for Layer III LSF (576). Layer I and >Layer II are always 384 and 1152 samples, respectively. What is Layer

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Free format

2000-08-21 Thread mailing-steve
>What is the point of free format ? >can winamp play it back ? Well, Winamp crashes when I try to feed him with a free format file (which is correct). It may be the input I'm using (in_mpg123.dll) . But it may be Winamp, I don't know. The thing is that I want mp3_check to be as reliable as possi

[MP3 ENCODER] Free format

2000-08-18 Thread mailing-steve
I'd like to find a free format encoded file. Does anyone of you know where I could find one or an encoder that support free format (also known as free bitrate) ? thx http://www..org -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

[MP3 ENCODER] MP3 frame question

2000-08-16 Thread mailing-steve
Is it possible to find a frame header inside a frame ? Since the CRC is not enough/always reliable to check a frame, I'd like to know if it's possible to find such a frame header inside, of it's to be considered an error. http://www..org -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3en

[MP3 ENCODER] CRC on MP3

2000-08-16 Thread mailing-steve
Hi everyone, I'd like to know where to find some sources or specifications on the CRC used on MP3 frames. I know I could get it in the lame sources, but I'd like to know first if it's fully compliant ! This is to integrate the CRC check in mp3_check. thx http://www..org -- MP3 ENCODER mail

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison

2000-07-17 Thread mailing-steve
>> In http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~djmrob/mp3decoders/index.html >>there's a comparison of mp3 decoders. Lame is one of the three that >passed >>the test (the other two are Winamp 2.22 and Ultra Player). But mpg123 >is >>not tested. What about it? Does anyone know any decoding problem with