Hello 'lamers',
Like many people on this list (I imagine) I have a fairly substantial
collection
of good quality (-v --preset studio) MP3s encoded with lame. I'd love to be
able to be able to make them smaller to squash more musiconto my portable
MP3 player.
Is it possible to have lame
From: Stephen Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Is it possible to have lame digitally resample an mp3 on a
frame-by-frame
basis? Although granted, the quality wouldn't be as good as a 'slow'
encoding,
I'd imagine this could be extremely fast!
Hmmm, I doubt it. The psychoacoustic model
| Like many people on this list (I imagine) I have a fairly substantial
| collection
| of good quality (-v --preset studio) MP3s encoded with lame. I'd love to
be
| able to be able to make them smaller to squash more musiconto my portable
| MP3 player.
|
| Is it possible to have lame digitally
Jaroslav Lukesh schrieb am Die, 22 Aug 2000:
lame -h -m j -b 64 --voice --noshort --resample 22.05 --lowpass 11.025
--lowpass-width 0 --mp3input x.mp3 x.small.mp3
why not lame --preset fm -h -k x.mp3 x.small.mp3 ???
but I would not use -k there.
Note that --voice options sounds
