Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame_Enc.dll and AudioGrabber

2000-05-16 Thread Helmut Hübers
Hi, Jackie wrote me back after I've sent the options from Mark to him, he will bring the high quality option in the next release of Audiograbber, but it will probably take two months until the next version will be available. We should use the command line encoder til then.   Helmut

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame_Enc.dll and AudioGrabber

2000-05-15 Thread Jaroslav Lukesh
| > | Odesílatel: Pierre Hugonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > | Why not using the command-line lame.exe in audiograbber instead of the | > DLL? At least you can set the switches exactly as you want (and no wonder | > if audiograbber correctly sets them) | > | | > | > Gr... Because you can grab fr

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame_Enc.dll and AudioGrabber

2000-05-15 Thread David Balazic
Jaroslav Lukesh wrote: > > | Odesílatel: Pierre Hugonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | Why not using the command-line lame.exe in audiograbber instead of the > DLL? At least you can set the switches exactly as you want (and no wonder > if audiograbber correctly sets them) > | > > Gr... Because you

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame_Enc.dll and AudioGrabber

2000-05-15 Thread Jaroslav Lukesh
| Odesílatel: Pierre Hugonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Why not using the command-line lame.exe in audiograbber instead of the DLL? At least you can set the switches exactly as you want (and no wonder if audiograbber correctly sets them) | Gr... Because you can grab from live audio input (and fr

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame_Enc.dll and AudioGrabber

2000-05-15 Thread Pierre Hugonnet
Helmut Hübers wrote: > > It is not possible to set that switch in the dll so I can't do that. You can e-mail >the LAME developers and tell them to enhance the dll interface so all switches can be >used with the dll too. I think they are planning to do that but it will not hurt of >you tell the

RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame_Enc.dll and AudioGrabber

2000-05-14 Thread Chuck Zenkus
The switches are in the EXTERNAL exe not the DLL > -- > From: Helmut H> übers[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2000 4:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame_Enc.dll and

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame_Enc.dll and AudioGrabber

2000-05-14 Thread Mark Taylor
> > Hi, > > I have contacted the author of Audiograbber, Jackie, and this is > what he said: > > -start- > Hi Helmut, > > It is not possible to set that switch in the dll so I can't do that. You can e-mail >the LAME developers and tell them to enhance the dll interface so all switches can be

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame_Enc.dll and AudioGrabber

2000-05-14 Thread Helmut Hübers
Hi,   I have contacted the author of Audiograbber, Jackie, and this is what he said:   -start- Hi Helmut,It is not possible to set that switch in the dll so I can't do that. You can e-mail the LAME developers and tell them to enhance the dll interface so all switches can be used with the dll

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame_Enc.dll and AudioGrabber

2000-05-12 Thread Zia Mazhar
Sorry Greg, I wasn't certain that Audiograbber alone is responsible for this... I was wondering that there _may be_ something on the code of the DLL that is not optimized for Audiograbber. By "optimizing" I am _of course_, not meaning that it has to be optimized only for Audiograbber. I just w

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Lame_Enc.dll and AudioGrabber

2000-05-12 Thread Greg Maxwell
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Zia Mazhar wrote: > Hi, > > With LAME Encoder's DLL, AudioGrabber doesn't seem to show the high-quality mode on >the pull down > menu of options. Checking the "Encode with Highest Quality" doesn't seem to do >anything, as the > speed remains exactly the same. I haven't com

[MP3 ENCODER] Lame_Enc.dll and AudioGrabber

2000-05-12 Thread Zia Mazhar
Hi, With LAME Encoder's DLL, AudioGrabber doesn't seem to show the high-quality mode on the pull down menu of options. Checking the "Encode with Highest Quality" doesn't seem to do anything, as the speed remains exactly the same. I haven't compared the output files, though. But I think the res