:: Hi, Robert Hegemann
:: Am 05.07.00 13:04:25 PM hast du dies geschrieben
> I have only an old VC4 on my Win95 installation and it's true that
> ICL is moaning a bit, but it bites :)
>
> just say you have an VC6 on your desk and go thru' it
> open a DOS-Box, make sure you have 'doskey' loaded
Karsten Luetkewitz schrieb am Mit, 05 Jul 2000:
> :: Hi, Mathew Hendry
>
> > The Standard edition doesn't include an optimizing compiler, so you're
> > unlikely to get a lot of speed out of it.
> > Try the 30-day evaluation version of Intel's compiler at
> > http://developer.intel.com/vtune/ . Ma
:: Hi, Mathew Hendry
> The Standard edition doesn't include an optimizing compiler, so you're
> unlikely to get a lot of speed out of it.
> Try the 30-day evaluation version of Intel's compiler at
> http://developer.intel.com/vtune/ . Makefile.MSVC has a special set of
> options for it.
Unluckil
> From: Karsten Luetkewitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> I grabbed the latest CVS source for 3.56 and compiled it with [...]
> MSVC standard edition.
> [...]
> I played around with compiling options in both files but got no higher
> than 1.2x realtime. I don't have any clue what optimal options
Hi !
I grabbed the latest CVS source for 3.56 and compiled it with DJGPP /
MSVC standard edition. While I was able to achieve 2.9x realtime
encoding with DJGPP the MSVC output only produced 0.9x realtime (while
both exes produce the exactly same output) :( I tried both, the
workspace file (releas
