Hi Mark,
you wrote on Wed, Oct 27 1999:
>> lame -b 128 -X5 -v -V 4 -h -k -d --resample 48 in.wav out48.mp3
>The bug is that the error message "Error: resample code not yet
>written!" was not being printed :-)
LOL! Thanks for the clarification.
>I think the upsample to 48kHz at 320kbs because
> Hi all,
>
> just gave it a try:
>
> lame -b 128 -X5 -v -V 4 -h -k -d --resample 48 in.wav out48.mp3
>
> The .wav file was grabbed from an audio-CD (44.1 kHz). mp3 sounds
> horrible, way too fast. Is this a feature or should the resampled file
> sound like the original? The FhG resamples to 4
Hi all,
just gave it a try:
lame -b 128 -X5 -v -V 4 -h -k -d --resample 48 in.wav out48.mp3
The .wav file was grabbed from an audio-CD (44.1 kHz). mp3 sounds
horrible, way too fast. Is this a feature or should the resampled file
sound like the original? The FhG resamples to 48 kHz without any
n
