RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp decoder plugins (Formerly Mp3 encoders quality tests)

2000-05-10 Thread Morten Abrahamsen
Maybe the MP2 support was an issue too :) Morten -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ross Levis Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 1:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp decoder plugins (Formerly Mp3 encoders quality tests

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp decoder plugins (Formerly Mp3 encoders quality tests)

2000-05-08 Thread Ross Levis
Shawn Riley wrote: > So why would Nullsoft (or whoever it is) abandon Fraunhofer for Nitrane? As others mentioned, they only used FHG's encoder for a short time while being sued. I would say the main reason for switching back is the cost. The license requires a payment to FHG for each MP3 pl

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Winamp decoder plugins (Formerly Mp3 encoders quality tests)

2000-05-08 Thread Zia Mazhar
This is the FhG plugin for WinAmp: http://www.chat.ru/~dkutsanov/in_mp3.zip -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

[MP3 ENCODER] Winamp decoder plugins (Formerly Mp3 encoders quality tests)

2000-05-08 Thread Shawn Riley
>Shawn Riley wrote: >> Can anyone say whether it would be wise to use an earlier version of Nitrane's >decoder (distributed w/ Winamp version 2.1-something ) with Winamp ver2.6-something? David wrote: >Note that some winamp versions ( early 2.x , I think ) didn't use >Nitrane , but Faunhofer !