Hello Christian,
Monday, May 08, 2000, 11:06:47 AM, you wrote:
>> Mark wrote:
>>My understanding is that a licence would probably be required
>> to keep this project out of trouble if the patching was removed & Lame
>> really became an MP3 encoder. [...]
CS> What about the idea with the trial-ve
Christian Schepke wrote:
> What about the idea with the trial-version of LAME. AFAIK it's allowed to
> distribute trialversions of mp3-encoders. We could include a little routine
> that displays a WARNING TRIAL EXPIRED or something alike, when the 30 days
> are over.
That is true BUT, the binary
> I think it's great that this could be done, but there must be
> something I've missed. My understanding is that a licence would
> probably be required to keep this project out of trouble if the
> patching was removed & Lame really became an MP3 encoder. Wouldn't
> that defeat one of the main pur
> LAME (LAME is After all a Mp3 Encoder)
I still like LAME (Lame ain't your momma's encoder)
jack.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
> Mark wrote:
> [...]
> I think it's great that this could be done, but there must be something
> I've missed. My understanding is that a licence would probably be required
> to keep this project out of trouble if the patching was removed & Lame
> really became an MP3 encoder. [...]
What about
Mark wrote:
>If no problems show up with 3.80, then in a few weeks I think
>we should make another official release, and finally drop all
>the dist10 patching stuff!
I think it's great that this could be done, but there must be something I've missed.
My understanding is that a licence would prob
Hello Felix,
Sunday, May 07, 2000, 6:53:16 PM, you wrote:
FvL> Thus spake Mark Taylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> If no problems show up with 3.80, then in a few weeks I think
>> we should make another official release, and finally drop all
>> the dist10 patching stuff!
FvL> VBR is 5-10% slower tha
Thus spake Mark Taylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> If no problems show up with 3.80, then in a few weeks I think
> we should make another official release, and finally drop all
> the dist10 patching stuff!
VBR is 5-10% slower than with 3.70. How comes?
Is it very difficult to integrate Takehiro's VBR
> If no problems show up with 3.80, then in a few weeks I think
> we should make another official release, and finally drop all
> the dist10 patching stuff!
Then LAME will be an MP3 Encoder? :-)
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
lame 3.80 beta is finally released!
http://www.sulaco.org/mp3
It still has both ISO code and Takehiro's bitstream.c(the default)
on the very unlikely chance that some problem shows up in bitstream.c
If no problems show up with 3.80, then in a few weeks I think
we should make another official re
10 matches
Mail list logo
