I'd guess you'd only get 90% compression on contrived examples. You
can, for example, compress a silent audio file with pkzip and get over
90% compression. ...
Zia Mazhar writes:
> Yep, Monkey's Audio is good indeed. However, on the ZAP web site they
> claim, " The technology behind ZAP simply
Yep, Monkey's Audio is good indeed. However, on the ZAP web site they
claim, " The technology behind ZAP simply means that digital audio can
be compressed up to 90% without any loss of information". I know
different wave files can be compressed to different extents, but 90%
lossless reduction is
Well, on the features they say "Typical reduction between 20% and 60%
"... So I guess it's 'bout the same. Monkey's Audio is more flexible...
It's fast, and has got WinAmp plugin. Anyway, a benchmark would be nice
to see.
- Zia
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Roel VdB wrote:
> Hello Cavallo,
>
> Thursday, August 10, 2000, 8:40:19 PM, you wrote:
>
> CdC> i found this on the net
> CdC> http://www.emagic.de/english/products/software/zap.html
>
> CdC> what do u think about?
>
> go for the best&free lossless audio compressor:
> http://www.monkeysaudio.com/
Hello Cavallo,
Thursday, August 10, 2000, 8:40:19 PM, you wrote:
CdC> i found this on the net
CdC> http://www.emagic.de/english/products/software/zap.html
CdC> what do u think about?
go for the best&free lossless audio compressor:
http://www.monkeysaudio.com/
--
Best regards,
Roel
i found this on the net
http://www.emagic.de/english/products/software/zap.html
what do u think about?
Cavallo de Cavallis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
=-=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--==
= http://www.s0ftpj.org =
= Digital Security for y2k =
==-=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=-==
"Knowledge
