Hi David!
David Bridson schrieb am Son, 13 Aug 2000:
> >As you probably know, the old VBR routine tries to
> >get an acceptable quantization at different bit
> >constraints, resulting in something like a binary
> >search for the optimal bit amount needed.
>
> While we're on the subject of VBR,
> From: "David Bridson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> While we're on the subject of VBR, I have one
> question about LAME: why does it only support such
> a limited number of bit rates. I've seen VBRs made
> with other encoders that don't rely just on a few
> bit rates but precisely adjust the bit rate
>As you probably know, the old VBR routine tries to
>get an acceptable quantization at different bit
>constraints, resulting in something like a binary
>search for the optimal bit amount needed.
While we're on the subject of VBR, I have one
question about LAME: why does it only support such
a
Hi Mike!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Son, 13 Aug 2000:
> Robert wrote
> > I checked in today a round about 20 percent
> > faster old VBR code.
>
> What changes did you make?
As you probably know, the old VBR routine tries to
get an acceptable quantization at different bit
constraints, resu
Robert wrote
> I checked in today a round about 20 percent
> faster old VBR code.
What changes did you make?
enquiring minds want to know :)
later
mike
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
