Damn, I forgot to add this to our documentation. I'll do it now in svn
and instead offer a link from the MPIR website. Sorry for the
omission.
Bill.
On 7 April 2010 03:37, Bill Hart wrote:
> You can provide binaries, but you of course need to also provide the
> source, so that any user of the bi
Hello all,
I'm Antony, a new recruit to the MPIR development team and am announcing
my intention to (try to) bring parallel processing to MPIR. I'd love to
say I'll be leading the effort but its more the case that I'll be
staggering in the right direction (or maybe just any direction) and
acceptin
I've updated the website with rc1, including what I think is the
current testing status.
Please notify of any omissions, corrections or otherwise.
Also, if anyone can help fill out the testing matrix, please let us know.
Bill.
On 7 April 2010 19:25, MPIR Team wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Despite our
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 20:08:07 Bill Hart wrote:
> Just wondering if we actually got MPIR working on icc in the end? I
> recall the two Jasons were working towards this, but I lost track of
> the final status. I could close the ticket if fixed and remove the
> Known Problem notification if so.
Just wondering if we actually got MPIR working on icc in the end? I
recall the two Jasons were working towards this, but I lost track of
the final status. I could close the ticket if fixed and remove the
Known Problem notification if so.
Bill
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
Great! Once again, welcome on board!
Bill.
On 7 April 2010 19:55, Antony Vennard wrote:
> Oh, so *this* is the real announcement! :D
>
> On a more serious note, my comments from last time still stand - I'm not
> sure about the political necessity of some features of the v3 licenses,
> but they s
Fixed in rc1. Thanks Jason!
Bill.
On 7 April 2010 19:58, Jason Moxham wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 April 2010 19:43:29 Bill Hart wrote:
>> Hmm, I already noticed one defect. The GPL and LGPL v2 license files
>> don't get picked up by make dist. Actually I don't know how to add
>> them. Jason Moxham
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 19:43:29 Bill Hart wrote:
> Hmm, I already noticed one defect. The GPL and LGPL v2 license files
> don't get picked up by make dist. Actually I don't know how to add
> them. Jason Moxham do you know?
>
> As some of the files are still LGPL v2+ licensed, we are supposed to
Oh, so *this* is the real announcement! :D
On a more serious note, my comments from last time still stand - I'm not
sure about the political necessity of some features of the v3 licenses,
but they still protect the essentials of open source (I've reviewed them
more closely since the joke I took to
Hmm, I already noticed one defect. The GPL and LGPL v2 license files
don't get picked up by make dist. Actually I don't know how to add
them. Jason Moxham do you know?
As some of the files are still LGPL v2+ licensed, we are supposed to
have a copy of that in there. The files in svn are gmp-2.0.tx
Dear All,
Despite our recent April Fools prank:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/d2777413749f37e5
the MPIR developers have actually been considering a switch to an LGPL v3+
license for a while, for the following reasons:
1) Maintaining GMP interface compatibility -
11 matches
Mail list logo
