I wouldn't worry about it. It is possible I overwrote my timings file
and that the times are not affected after all.
On 9 January 2012 17:56, Jason wrote:
> On Sunday 08 January 2012 11:30:05 Bill Hart wrote:
>> I decided to try the FFT without addsub_n and it seems to actually go
>> consistently
On Sunday 08 January 2012 11:30:05 Bill Hart wrote:
> I decided to try the FFT without addsub_n and it seems to actually go
> consistently about 3% faster, which is totally mysterious. So I have
> removed it from the two files it is defined in:
Thats very strange , I assume this is on a K10 , wha
