On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 5:38:46 PM UTC+1, michael85 wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> Thank you for the insightful comments, but your statement regarding the
> code not being suitable for cryptographic use is quite disappointing for
> me. Indeed, it looks discouraging to try and implement the require
Hi Brian,
Thank you for the insightful comments, but your statement regarding the
code not being suitable for cryptographic use is quite disappointing for
me. Indeed, it looks discouraging to try and implement the required
primitives in a secure and safe manner using this library, but are there
On 27 March 2012 16:42, Cactus wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:38:57 PM UTC+1, michael85 wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have started working on a client server system in C++ for privacy
>> preserving signal processing applications. Since this system will rely on
>> certain public key cryptogr
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:38:57 PM UTC+1, michael85 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have started working on a client server system in C++ for privacy
> preserving signal processing applications. Since this system will rely on
> certain public key cryptography primitives, I decided to try and implemen
Hello,
I have started working on a client server system in C++ for privacy preserving
signal processing applications. Since this system will rely on certain public
key cryptography primitives, I decided to try and implement them with MPIR,
since GMP seems a bit more complicated to compile on Wi
