On 14/01/2013 22:25, MJ Michaels wrote:
[snip]
>> So its certainly not a good idea unless you limit yourself to the generic C
>> build. And here, of course, you are on your own since it is not a tested
>> configuration.
>
> Thanks for the answer Brian. My problem is that I have code on all ot
On Monday, 14 January 2013 22:25:11 UTC, MJ Michaels wrote:
> On Monday, January 14, 2013 4:44:44 PM UTC-5, Cactus wrote:
> > On Monday, 14 January 2013 18:37:16 UTC, MJ Michaels wrote:
> > Is it possible to configure the VC10 build in MPIR 2.6.0 to generate
> 64-bit limbs? I am able to do th
On Monday, January 14, 2013 4:44:44 PM UTC-5, Cactus wrote:
> On Monday, 14 January 2013 18:37:16 UTC, MJ Michaels wrote:
> Is it possible to configure the VC10 build in MPIR 2.6.0 to generate 64-bit
> limbs? I am able to do this, but have to edit mpir.h by hand to get it to
> work, and I'm won
On Monday, 14 January 2013 18:37:16 UTC, MJ Michaels wrote:
> Is it possible to configure the VC10 build in MPIR 2.6.0 to generate
> 64-bit limbs? I am able to do this, but have to edit mpir.h by hand to get
> it to work, and I'm wondering if there's just some build option that I'm
> missing.
Is it possible to configure the VC10 build in MPIR 2.6.0 to generate 64-bit
limbs? I am able to do this, but have to edit mpir.h by hand to get it to
work, and I'm wondering if there's just some build option that I'm missing. I
basically just remove references to "#ifdef _WIN64". Is there a r
