On Saturday 03 December 2011 22:40:51 Cactus wrote:
> I can only comment on the MSVC Windows build, for which I believe mpir.h is
> identical DLL and static library builds. To double check this I have just
> built both and compared the two mpir.h files that were generated.
>
> In fact mpir.h i
I can only comment on the MSVC Windows build, for which I believe mpir.h is
identical DLL and static library builds. To double check this I have just
built both and compared the two mpir.h files that were generated.
In fact mpir.h is now identical for win32 and x64 builds as well since I
chan
On Saturday 03 December 2011 19:13:41 Bill Hart wrote:
> Forwarding to MPIR devel, where it might get some attention.
>
> On 3 December 2011 19:08, kcrisman wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Dec 3, 1:08 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> >> I have a repeatable failure. This is presumably due to the MPIR
> >> upgrade in
Forwarding to MPIR devel, where it might get some attention.
On 3 December 2011 19:08, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 3, 1:08 pm, kcrisman wrote:
>> I have a repeatable failure. This is presumably due to the MPIR
>> upgrade in 4.8.alpha0, seehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8664,
>
> Ah,
