Thanks Brian. I put a note on the website about this to warn people
that the benchmark is not suitable for comparisons of that kind, with
specific mention of these two parts (fermat and mersenne). I obviously
didn't fully realise that. My bad.
Bill.
2010/1/11 Cactus :
>
>
> On Jan 11, 3:23 am, Bi
On Jan 11, 3:23 am, Bill Hart wrote:
> No problems. Sleep well.
>
> And can I suggest that next time when you find a problem, discuss it
> with us, rather than just calling us cheaters and ridiculing us.
>
> There's something like 300,000 lines of code in MPIR (much of it from
> the original GMP
No problems. Sleep well.
And can I suggest that next time when you find a problem, discuss it
with us, rather than just calling us cheaters and ridiculing us.
There's something like 300,000 lines of code in MPIR (much of it from
the original GMP project - give credit where it is due). In such a
v
Oh, sorry
It's better for me to really go to bad.
'night!
Gian.
On 11 Gen, 04:11, Bill Hart wrote:
> Go back and read what I wrote.
>
> 2010/1/11 Gianrico Fini :
>
> > Hei! And what about the same mess on mersenne?
>
> > Gian.
>
> > On 11 Gen, 04:03, Bill Hart wrote:
> >> Hi Brian,
>
> >>
Go back and read what I wrote.
2010/1/11 Gianrico Fini :
> Hei! And what about the same mess on mersenne?
>
> Gian.
>
> On 11 Gen, 04:03, Bill Hart wrote:
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> I don't know if you've been following the discussion with Gianrico
>>
>> but would it be possible to change the ben
Hei! And what about the same mess on mersenne?
Gian.
On 11 Gen, 04:03, Bill Hart wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> I don't know if you've been following the discussion with Gianrico
>
> but would it be possible to change the benchmark code so that when
> running the benchmark linked against GMP it
