On Jan 8, 6:03 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
> It's surely as much an issue for them as it is for us. I personally
> would be inclined to discuss the issue with them as they seem like
> reasonable and helpful people.
>
> Of course they aren't going to fix it overnight, whereas we want to
> release as soo
It's surely as much an issue for them as it is for us. I personally
would be inclined to discuss the issue with them as they seem like
reasonable and helpful people.
Of course they aren't going to fix it overnight, whereas we want to
release as soon as possible. So this is indeed going to be an an
On Jan 8, 5:19 pm, Cactus wrote:
> The change to mp_size_t and mp_exp_t on WIndows to use a 64-bit long
> long type seems to be incompatible with MPFR.
>
> After accounting for the addition of a __GMP_MP_SIZE_T_INT value of 2,
> the following MPFR assertion fails:
>
> ..\..\init2.c:42: MPFR asse
