On Wednesday 24 December 2008 09:39:20 Bill Hart wrote:
> Merry Christmas Brian (and all).
>
> I used to have an Athlon XP but no longer. However I do have an AMP
> Turion 64 x2 and of course have access to Opterons. I'm betting the
> tuning parameters are nearly the same for these machines. We ca
Merry Christmas Brian (and all).
I used to have an Athlon XP but no longer. However I do have an AMP
Turion 64 x2 and of course have access to Opterons. I'm betting the
tuning parameters are nearly the same for these machines. We can give
it a go. I'll send a file hopefully later today. It can't
On Dec 24, 8:50 am, Cactus wrote:
> On Dec 23, 11:31 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Tuesday 23 December 2008 22:52:10 Cactus wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 22, 11:55 pm, jason wrote:
> > > > On Dec 20, 1:13 pm, Cactus wrote:
> > > > > On Dec 20, 10:49 am, Cactus wrote:
> > > > > >
On Dec 23, 11:31 pm, ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 December 2008 22:52:10 Cactus wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 22, 11:55 pm, jason wrote:
> > > On Dec 20, 1:13 pm, Cactus wrote:
> > > > On Dec 20, 10:49 am, Cactus wrote:
> > > > > On Dec 20, 3:56 am, "Bill Hart" wrote:
>
> > > >
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 23:53:39 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 December 2008 23:31:33 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 December 2008 22:52:10 Cactus wrote:
> > > On Dec 22, 11:55 pm, jason wrote:
> > > > On Dec 20, 1:13 pm, Cactus wrote:
> > > > > On Dec
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 23:31:33 ja...@njkfrudils.plus.com wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 December 2008 22:52:10 Cactus wrote:
> > On Dec 22, 11:55 pm, jason wrote:
> > > On Dec 20, 1:13 pm, Cactus wrote:
> > > > On Dec 20, 10:49 am, Cactus wrote:
> > > > > On Dec 20, 3:56 am, "Bill Hart"
> > > >
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 22:52:10 Cactus wrote:
> On Dec 22, 11:55 pm, jason wrote:
> > On Dec 20, 1:13 pm, Cactus wrote:
> > > On Dec 20, 10:49 am, Cactus wrote:
> > > > On Dec 20, 3:56 am, "Bill Hart" wrote:
> > >
> > > Following up my earlier results, I have now played with alignment and
On Dec 22, 11:55 pm, jason wrote:
> On Dec 20, 1:13 pm, Cactus wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 20, 10:49 am, Cactus wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 20, 3:56 am, "Bill Hart" wrote:
>
> > Following up my earlier results, I have now played with alignment and
> > jump decisions and I find that:
>
> > jc
On Dec 20, 1:13 pm, Cactus wrote:
> On Dec 20, 10:49 am, Cactus wrote:
>
> > On Dec 20, 3:56 am, "Bill Hart" wrote:
>
> Following up my earlier results, I have now played with alignment and
> jump decisions and I find that:
>
> jc .1
> jmp .2
>
> align 16
> .1:mov r
I'm working on that right now :-)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> OK, I see there is now a K8-experimental, so I'll hold off on making
> another copy for now. Once Jason Martin has finished with the GCD
> patches I/someone will make the copy.
--~--~-~--~~-
On Saturday 20 December 2008 03:54:01 Bill Hart wrote:
> Hi jason,
>
> What hardware did you get a benchmark of 9000 on? The benchmark will
Sempron 1800Mhz
> change depending on the speed of the processor and the type of
> machine.
>
> It certainly sounds good in comparison with gmp.
>
> It is i
On Dec 20, 10:49 am, Cactus wrote:
> On Dec 20, 3:56 am, "Bill Hart" wrote:
Following up my earlier results, I have now played with alignment and
jump decisions and I find that:
jc .1
jmp .2
align 16
.1:mov rax, [r10+r8*8]
in which there is a jump to aligned code
On Dec 20, 3:56 am, "Bill Hart" wrote:
> OK, I see there is now a K8-experimental, so I'll hold off on making
> another copy for now. Once Jason Martin has finished with the GCD
> patches I/someone will make the copy.
>
> Bill.
>
> 2008/12/20 Bill Hart :
>
> > Hi jason,
>
> > What hardware did
OK, I see there is now a K8-experimental, so I'll hold off on making
another copy for now. Once Jason Martin has finished with the GCD
patches I/someone will make the copy.
Bill.
2008/12/20 Bill Hart :
> Hi jason,
>
> What hardware did you get a benchmark of 9000 on? The benchmark will
> change
Hi jason,
What hardware did you get a benchmark of 9000 on? The benchmark will
change depending on the speed of the processor and the type of
machine.
It certainly sounds good in comparison with gmp.
It is important not to increase the code size too much. It might make
one function faster, but
15 matches
Mail list logo
