On May 4, 10:12 am, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Another Windows bug. Thanks for pointing these out Chris! It should be > changed to return the largest mp_bitcnt_t. > > Bill. > > On 4 May 2011 03:24, Chris <chrisjohnsaund...@shaw.ca> wrote: > > > > > In the documentation for mpz_popcount this is stated: > > > If op < 0, the number of 1s is infinite, and the return value is ULONG_MAX, > > the largest possible mp_bitcnt_t. > > > Now I built an x64 system amd mp_bitcnt_t is a 64bit number but ULONG_MAX is > > a 32bit number. I'm wondering what will be the result if op < 0 on my > > system? > > > Regards > > Chris Saunders > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "mpir-devel" group. > > To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.
I have just added a define for __GMP_BITCNT_MAX and adjusted the mpz_popcount code to use it. Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mpir-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en.