On Thursday 05 January 2012 03:42:28 Bill Hart wrote:
> So sumdiff_n would be defined for all x86_64 machines?
>
sumdiff is already defined on all machines , although only fast if HAVE_NATIVE
, the general sumdiff used is an old one from gmp ment to be used for fft's ,
it just splits it into L1
So sumdiff_n would be defined for all x86_64 machines?
What about addsub_n?
Bill.
On 4 January 2012 23:23, jason wrote:
> I had forgotten this but mpir-2.5.0 does have a sumdiff for core2 :)
>
> On Dec 27 2011, 5:27 pm, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>> In my FFT I make use of mpn_sumdiff_n and mpn_addsub
I had forgotten this but mpir-2.5.0 does have a sumdiff for core2 :)
On Dec 27 2011, 5:27 pm, Bill Hart
wrote:
> In my FFT I make use of mpn_sumdiff_n and mpn_addsub_n. It seems these
> are not exported even though there are generic C versions.
>
> Also, I see there is no sumdiff_n.as on core2 st
