Yep, I'm wrong about the license. It is GPL v2 on those files.
Moreover, it is not necessary for them to be LGPL (our current ones
are not) as they don't end up being linked when the library is built.
So we can use them.
We should first grep for changes to configfsf.sub which we have
heavily modi
Try
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/config
or
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/
On Friday 17 April 2009 02:12:42 Bill Hart wrote:
> I believe we have done quite a bit of hacking to that too.
>
> The link you gave is not working for me for some reason - I think
> because it is ftp and I am in
I believe we have done quite a bit of hacking to that too.
The link you gave is not working for me for some reason - I think
because it is ftp and I am in an apartment complex with strange
internet connection, but I think from memory all those config.guess
and configfsf.guess etc were all incompa
