Sorry, there was a bollixed-up paragraph in my last post.
Then, of course, there's the bold-faced stereotyping. In other contexts,
Michael is a resolute advocate of well-designed objective tests. I
challenge him to compile whatever he considers city-level "gay agenda"
items, then cite believes he
Michael notes:
>
> Stonewall's Agenda:
>
> http://www.StonewallDFL.org/resolutions/resolutions.htm
>
> National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's Agenda:
>
> http://www.ngltf.org/issues/index.cfm
>
> Denial is not going to help anyone.
No, but neither is misdirection.
Remember, this whole debate
At 08:45 AM 10/21/2001 -0500, Michael Atherton wrote:
>Eva Young wrote:
>
>> I've never quite understood what the "homosexual agenda" is.
>>
>
>Stonewall's Agenda:
>
>http://www.StonewallDFL.org/resolutions/resolutions.htm
>
>National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's Agenda:
>
>http://www.ngltf.org/is
Eva Young wrote:
> I've never quite understood what the "homosexual agenda" is.
>
Stonewall's Agenda:
http://www.StonewallDFL.org/resolutions/resolutions.htm
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's Agenda:
http://www.ngltf.org/issues/index.cfm
Denial is not going to help anyone.
Michael Ather
At 03:55 PM 10/20/2001 -0500, Patrick Peterson wrote:
>Scott makes a good point -- if Stenglein campaigned on such homophobic
>drivel, it's not hard to see why he lost in the primary.
>
>One interesting thing: Stenglein is from Northeast (where I am also from),
>a generally conservative area of
Patrick Peterson wrote:
> Scott makes a good point -- if Stenglein campaigned on such homophobic
> drivel, it's not hard to see why he lost in the primary.
As I said, "Minneapolis politics seems to have a lot to do with placing people
who hold opposing viewpoints on the other side of the rainbow
Scott makes a good point -- if Stenglein campaigned on such homophobic
drivel, it's not hard to see why he lost in the primary.
One interesting thing: Stenglein is from Northeast (where I am also from),
a generally conservative area of the city. Although he took NE, Stenglein
is out of touch
