RE: [Mpls] Instant runoff voting

2005-02-28 Thread Jeanne Massey
Sen. Higgins: The city of Minneapolis cannot implement IRV without state approval. IRV would take a change in STATE law, something that was tried last year for a special election in Roseville. To clarify, state approval for change in election/voting procedures is needed for non-home-rule citie

Re: [Mpls] Instant runoff voting

2005-02-28 Thread David Brauer
On Feb 28, 2005, at 9:51 AM, Sen.Linda Higgins wrote: IRV would take a change in STATE law, something that was tried last year for a special election in Roseville. Unfortunately, the Minnesota Citizens Concerned for LIfe decided to sandbag the bill and it was defeated. The city of Minneapolis can

[Mpls] Instant runoff voting

2005-02-28 Thread Sen.Linda Higgins
IRV would take a change in STATE law, something that was tried last year for a special election in Roseville. Unfortunately, the Minnesota Citizens Concerned for LIfe decided to sandbag the bill and it was defeated. The city of Minneapolis cannot implement IRV without state approval. IRV is in a c

[Mpls] Instant Runoff Voting resolution

2005-02-27 Thread Jeanne Massey
Below is a resolution for the use of Instant Runoff Voting or IRV (also called Ranked Choice Voting) in city elections. Such a change requires an amendment to the city charter.  Gaining support within the political parties is an important step in the process and the resolution below is for use in t

[Mpls] Instant Runoff Voting

2002-08-22 Thread Leighton, Thomas J
#981 - 19 msgs > > > Message: 7 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:51:25 -0700 > Subject: Re: [Mpls] Instant Runoff Voting > > If anyone disagrees that IRV is superior to our > current system, please point out how and

Re: [Mpls] Instant Runoff Voting

2002-08-21 Thread BudTBum
If anyone disagrees that IRV is superior to our current system, please point out how and why. * Take a three candidate election, 1 liberal, one conservative, one independent. For simplicity, use 12 voters (in real life you would need to expand the percentages) 5 prefer t

Re: [Mpls] Instant Runoff Voting

2002-08-21 Thread Andy Driscoll
yes." --Nagarjuna > From: phaedrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:14:30 -0700 (PDT) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Mpls] Instant Runoff Voting > > Can anyone tell me why Minneapolis does not use > Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) for all elected positions?

[Mpls] Instant Runoff Voting

2002-08-21 Thread phaedrus
Can anyone tell me why Minneapolis does not use Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) for all elected positions? This will allow all people to vote for the candidate that best matches their own priorities while reducing or eliminating the concerns like the Nader/Gore situation. It also insures that any win